2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-earthquake short-run labor income shifts. What happens with the distribution of wages after an earthquake?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper adds to a large literature on the economic effects of natural disasters on local economies (Lima & Barbosa, 2019: Kim & Marcouiller, 2015Xiao, 2011). We expand existing knowledge about the impacts of natural disasters on tourism demand (Huang & Min, 2002;Mazzocchi & Montini, 2001;Rosselló et al, 2020), tourism supply (Brown et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021) and labor markets (Belasen & Polachek, 2008;Ewing et al, 2009;Fouzia et al, 2020;Mendoza & Jara, 2022;Rodríguez-Oreggia, 2013) by jointly examining the distinct temporal trajectories followed by tourism demand and supply and the hospitality labor market during and post the volcano eruption. In doing so, we can assess potential asymmetric reactions across regions, over time and among outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The paper adds to a large literature on the economic effects of natural disasters on local economies (Lima & Barbosa, 2019: Kim & Marcouiller, 2015Xiao, 2011). We expand existing knowledge about the impacts of natural disasters on tourism demand (Huang & Min, 2002;Mazzocchi & Montini, 2001;Rosselló et al, 2020), tourism supply (Brown et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021) and labor markets (Belasen & Polachek, 2008;Ewing et al, 2009;Fouzia et al, 2020;Mendoza & Jara, 2022;Rodríguez-Oreggia, 2013) by jointly examining the distinct temporal trajectories followed by tourism demand and supply and the hospitality labor market during and post the volcano eruption. In doing so, we can assess potential asymmetric reactions across regions, over time and among outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The earthquake indicator is a suitable instrument only if the exclusion restriction holds-i.e., if the seismic phenomena are likely to influence the enrollment in school only through their impact on the land rent. In this respect, recent literature has shown that natural disasters can lead to a decrease in income inequality, resulting in lower levels of wealth inequality, due to new opportunities for poorer households (see, for instance, Abdullah et al, 2016;Mendoza and Jara, 2022;Keerthiratne and Tol, 2018). Although income data before and after these events are not available, we expect that certain institutional policies implemented to respond to major earthquakes may have provided new opportunities and increased social mobility for the less affluent segments the population, increasing in this way the size of the wealthy household share of the population.…”
Section: Historical Evidence Supporting the Exclusion Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%