2018
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2018.2844735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Fabrication Melting Procedure With I-Shaped Beams for Stiction-Free Release of 2-D Surface-Micromachined Micromirrors Equipped With Repulsive-Force Actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEMS micromirrors can be classified into two categories according to the mirror plate‘s fabrication method and the aperture size. The first type has the mirror plate and actuator in the same body with an aperture of normally <1 mm [1,2,3,8,20] and surface flatness of ROC (radius of curvature) of normally <1 m. The second type can achieve a large aperture (several millimeters) with a high flatness (ROC >10 m), in which the mirror plate and actuator are fabricated separately and then bonded together afterwards [21,22]. For numerous laser scanning applications, such as laser engraving and LiDAR, a large aperture (e.g., one millimeter to several millimeters) and high flatness are preferred to accommodate a higher laser power or lower the laser power density, as well as achieve a better collimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEMS micromirrors can be classified into two categories according to the mirror plate‘s fabrication method and the aperture size. The first type has the mirror plate and actuator in the same body with an aperture of normally <1 mm [1,2,3,8,20] and surface flatness of ROC (radius of curvature) of normally <1 m. The second type can achieve a large aperture (several millimeters) with a high flatness (ROC >10 m), in which the mirror plate and actuator are fabricated separately and then bonded together afterwards [21,22]. For numerous laser scanning applications, such as laser engraving and LiDAR, a large aperture (e.g., one millimeter to several millimeters) and high flatness are preferred to accommodate a higher laser power or lower the laser power density, as well as achieve a better collimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence there is no voltage difference between the mirror plate and the electrode underneath. As a result, no repulsive-force actuator is needed to push the mirror plate up when melting the beams, as is the case in the previously developed melted I-shape beam mechanism [26]. Therefore, the post-fabrication melted supporting beams mechanism can be widely used by general surface-micromachined large structure since repulsive-force actuators are not needed, which require a lot of extra space.…”
Section: Melting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation result shows that the voltage difference is less than 0.1 V when melting the supporting beams, which does not cause significant attractive electrostatic force to pull the mirror plate to touch the electrode underneath and cause stiction problem. So the repulsive-force actuators are not needed to push the mirror plate up to counter act the pulling force as the case in the previously developed melting beam mechanism [26]. Figure 3(a) shows an example of voltage distribution when melting the supporting beam 6.…”
Section: Melting Supporting Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations