Post-feminist advertising laid bare: Young women’s talk about the sexually agentic woman of ‘midriff ’ advertising

Abstract

This paper presents a feminist Foucauldian analysis of women’s interpretations of images of women in post-feminist advertising. Building on Ros Gill’s analysis of post-feminist advertising images of women, and more specifically the figure of ‘the midriff ’, the paper presents an analysis of focus group discussions with seven young women who were asked to discuss ‘midriff’ advertising images. Whilst participants sometimes construed these images positively as ‘sexy’ and independent, midriff figures were more frequently constituted negatively as ‘bimbos’ and/or ‘slutty’ ‘sex objects’ whose seeming independence was achieved through or limited only to attracting men. In interpreting midriff figures negatively, participants, we suggest, constituted the midriff as other; as different and distant from themselves and ‘normal’ women. Where occasionally participants interpreted images more favourably, the midriff figure was, in contrast, constituted as ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ and as being about ‘what she likes, not what he likes’. Participants did not identify themselves or their arguments as feminist. Nevertheless, they articulated critiques of these images which often converged significantly with critical feminist analyses. Our analysis suggests, therefore, that young women read these images in complex ways. These complexities of interpretation, we argue, should be central in understanding the relationships between women, bodies and post-feminist images of women’s bodies.

Deconstructing Health and the Un/Healthy Fat Woman

“…Surprisingly, the women in our study rarely mentioned or even alluded to the gendering of body weight and weight management or to their roles as mothers or wives. Although women are clearly constituted as agentic neoliberal subjects in Western societies and made responsible for their own individual health choices in line with dominant expert knowledges, their neoliberal citizenship is cross‐cut with heteronormative ‘ideals’ of (post‐feminist) femininity in which beauty continues to be equated with thinness/slimness (Gill, ; Malson, Halliwell, Tischner, & Rudolfsdottir, ; Ringrose & Walkerdine, ). And, as noted earlier, it also entails responsibility for the care and well‐being of children, husbands and other family members (e.g.…”

Choosing to conform: The discursive complexities of choice in relation to feminine beauty practices

“…Gill, 2008;Levy, 2005;Evans et al 2010;Malson, Halliwell, Tischner & Rudolfsdottir, 2011). In this paper we focus on beauty practices, however the core issues remain very closely related, in the need to analyse complex subversions of 'choice' discourses.…”

Between Image and Spectator: Reception Studies as Visual Methodology

“…This approach to studying television has been recuperated and channelled into the genre itself, with Channel 4's Gogglebox being a particularly salient example. 8 By contrast, still media imagery has received less attention in the Academy (although see Benwell 2008;Malson et al 2011). A body of scholarship on reception also exists in the fields of Art History (Baxandall 1985;Butler 2016;Walker 1991), English literature (Modleski 1984;Radway 1992) and Film Studies (Staiger 1992 When it comes to the field of Fashion Studies, studies of reception are few.…”