2018
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Fermentation Recovery of Biobased Carboxylic Acids

Abstract: Carboxylic acids are common products produced from the bioconversion of renewable feedstocks. In these processes the separation of the acid product from fermentation broth is the most energy and cost intensive unit operation. Thus, the development of robust, scalable separation approaches that can be applied to a variety of carboxylates is of critical importance to the development of processes that utilize carboxylic acids as platform chemicals. Here we report a batch separation method that includes cell and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of butyric acid in the enzyme treatments could be the result of proliferation of Clostridia species, whose growth may be enabled by the higher pH of 5.0–5.1 for these experimental conditions after 30 days compared to a pH of 4.2 in anaerobic and sulfuric acid-treated samples. Butyric acid formation during ensilage of herbaceous biomass destined for animal feed is discouraged since it results in a feed unpalatable for livestock [34]; however, butyric acid formation in biomass destined for fuel production may have economic advantages if combined with other carboxylic acid fermentations [35]. Propionic and isovaleric acid production in all treatments appeared to be time dependent, experiencing an approximate two- to threefold increase between 30 and 180 days storage depending on treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of butyric acid in the enzyme treatments could be the result of proliferation of Clostridia species, whose growth may be enabled by the higher pH of 5.0–5.1 for these experimental conditions after 30 days compared to a pH of 4.2 in anaerobic and sulfuric acid-treated samples. Butyric acid formation during ensilage of herbaceous biomass destined for animal feed is discouraged since it results in a feed unpalatable for livestock [34]; however, butyric acid formation in biomass destined for fuel production may have economic advantages if combined with other carboxylic acid fermentations [35]. Propionic and isovaleric acid production in all treatments appeared to be time dependent, experiencing an approximate two- to threefold increase between 30 and 180 days storage depending on treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtrate is subsequently passed through an activated carbon column to remove additives such as dyes and pigments. 35,43,44 These steps inherently assume that rTPA at pH > 7 remains soluble in the aqueous phase. The solution is then acidified by the addition of sulfuric acid to lower the pH to 2.5 and cooled to precipitate rTPA.…”
Section: Ll Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process modeled here assumes that dyes, pigments, and adhesives are removed by the solid ll OPEN ACCESS filtration and activated carbon column. 35,[42][43][44] Spent enzymes are removed by ultrafiltration in the base case, which may not be a necessary step if there is sufficient removal by the activated carbon column, 101 thereby resulting in a lower MSP. Although this design is aligned with reported practices, alternate and emergent separation techniques for product recovery can be potentially explored.…”
Section: Enzyme Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aromatic compounds in the lignin-rich supernatant were analyzed by electrospray ionization (ESI) liquid chromatography (LC) mass spectrometry (MS/MS) on an Ion Trap SL (Agilent) as previously described (26). Glucose and small acids in the culture supernatants were analyzed by LC-refractive index detector (RID)/UV on a Agilent 1200 LC system as previously described (71). Aromatic compounds in the OMV in vitro assays were analyzed by ESI-LC-MS/MS on a 6470 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Agilent) with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for each analyte.…”
Section: Nad(p)h Consumption Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%