Post-Fire Carbon Dynamics in Subalpine Forests of the Rocky Mountains

Abstract

Forests store a large amount of terrestrial carbon, but this storage capacity is vulnerable to wildfire. Combustion, and subsequent tree mortality and soil erosion, can lead to increased carbon release and decreased carbon uptake. Previous work has shown that non-constant fire return intervals over the past 4000 years strongly shaped subalpine forest carbon trajectories. The extent to which fire-regime variability has impacted carbon trajectories in other subalpine forest types is unknown. Here, we explored the interactions between fire and carbon dynamics of 14 subalpine watersheds in Colorado, USA. We tested the impact of varying fire frequency over a ~2000 year period on ecosystem productivity and carbon storage using an improved biogeochemical model. High fire frequency simulations had overall lower carbon stocks across all sites compared to scenarios with lower fire frequencies, highlighting the importance of fire-frequency in determining ecosystem carbon storage. Additionally, variability in fire-free periods strongly influenced carbon trajectories across all the sites. Biogeochemical trajectories (e.g., increasing or decreasing total ecosystem carbon and carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratios) did not vary among forest types but there were trends that they may vary by elevation. Lower-elevations sites had lower overall soil C:N ratios, potentially because of higher fire frequencies reducing carbon inputs more than nitrogen losses over time. Additional measurements of ecosystem response to fire-regime variability will be essential for improving estimates of carbon dynamics from Earth system models.

Response of avian cavity nesters and carbon dynamics to forest management and climate change in the Northern Rockies

“…2014, Bartowitz et al. 2019). Contemporary fire regimes have changed because of fire suppression and harvest management (Arno et al.…”

Harnessing NEON to evaluate ecological tipping points: Opportunities, challenges, and approaches

“…Predicting abrupt or long‐term ecological change is challenging; future conditions are unrealized and directional climate change complicates projections of future ecological functioning, which may impede model‐informed conservation or land management policies (Beckage et al, 2011; Bonan & Doney, 2018). Process‐based models can mechanistically represent ecosystem functioning over millennia (Kelly et al, 2016), and the use of millennial‐scale records within a mechanistic model has elucidated long‐lasting biogeochemical legacies (Bartowitz et al, 2019; Hudiburg et al, 2017). Similarly, increased ecological data availability may help decrease parameter uncertainty in ecosystem models, leading to more accurate simulations (Fisher & Koven, 2020).…”

Harnessing the NEON data revolution to advance open environmental science with a diverse and data‐capable community

“…The impacts of disturbance on an ecosystem are controlled by its intensity, frequency, size, spatial pattern, and spatial extent. Some disturbances like wildfires can occur multiple times during an ecosystem's response period, affecting the resilience and recovery of the system (Bartowitz et al 2019;Mahood & Balch 2019). NEON's sampling design, including repeat sampling covering the full range of U.S. ecological and geo-climatic diversity, helps evaluate the impacts of these frequent disturbance events.…”