“…• Helpful for initiating treatment programs [118] • Symptom assessment and comparison of a large number of people [119] • Useful in time-limited situations [120] • Useful for in-person surveys with low literacy populations [121] • Not be totally reliable, may overestimate prevalence [118,119,173,174] • Not formally validated in Nepalese population [138] • Relies on DSM-IV criteria [152] • No validity or reliability for Turkish, French, Tamil, Sinhalese version [153][154][155] • Might not be culturally sensitive [156] • Low-range scores may be misdiagnosed [157] • May underestimate prevalence [158] • Lack of a cutoff recommendation [150,159,173] • Flood-affected adults in Tamil Nadu [118] • Survivors of the 2013 North India floods [121] • Swedish survivors of the 1994 MS Estonia disaster [122] • People affected by Hurricane Sandy [123] • Adult survivors, pregnant survivors of Wenchuan earthquake [124,125,133,142] • General population, students, low-income parents who survived Hurricane Katrina [126,128,130,141,143] • Survivors of mudslide and Wenchuan earthquake [127] • Rescue workers of Great East Japan Earthquake [129] • Survivors of 2000 Miyake Island volcanic eruption [131] • Survivors of 2010 Canterbury, New Zealand earthquakes [137] • Those who experienced 2014 flood in Malaysia [140] • Treatment-seeking individuals who experien...…”