2021
DOI: 10.1177/09636897211001774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation

Abstract: A recent randomized, multicenter trial did not show benefit of a CXCR1/2 receptor inhibitor (Reparixin) when analysis included marginal islet mass (>3,000 IEQ/kg) for allotransplantation and when immunosuppression regimens were not standardized among participating centers. We present a post-hoc analysis of trial patients from our center at the University of Chicago who received an islet mass of over 5,000 IEQ/kg and a standardized immunosuppression regimen of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction. Twe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six studies were excluded because of our prespecified exclusion criteria: one was not randomized ( 44 ), two did not involve patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality ( 45 , 46 ), two included cancer patients ( 47 , 48 ), and one was conducted in healthy volunteers ( 49 ). A sixth study ( 50 ) was excluded because it was a post-hoc analysis of a single-center small cohort derived from a multicentric trial ( 46 ). The six manuscripts included in the present meta-analysis ( 21 , 51 55 ) randomized 406 patients (220 received reparixin and 186 received the comparator).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies were excluded because of our prespecified exclusion criteria: one was not randomized ( 44 ), two did not involve patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality ( 45 , 46 ), two included cancer patients ( 47 , 48 ), and one was conducted in healthy volunteers ( 49 ). A sixth study ( 50 ) was excluded because it was a post-hoc analysis of a single-center small cohort derived from a multicentric trial ( 46 ). The six manuscripts included in the present meta-analysis ( 21 , 51 55 ) randomized 406 patients (220 received reparixin and 186 received the comparator).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, five studies were excluded based on our predefined exclusion criteria. One study was not randomised, 21 two included cancer patients, 22,24 one was conducted in healthy volunteers, 25 and one 26 was a post-hoc analysis of a small single-centre cohort derived from a multicentric trial. 27 Overall, nine studies 16,17,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 733 randomised patients, of which 437 received reparixin and 296 received the comparator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a single transplant procedure, the patient receives a limited islet mass as current technology allows to retrieve, on average, only 30-60% of the 1 million islets present in the human pancreas. Much less than 75% of those infused islets engraft into the liver and resume metabolic activity [3][4][5]. Patients with T1DM, on average, require at least two islet transplantations to obtain ~60% of the islet mass physiologically present in a healthy pancreas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%