Post-industrial, post-socialist or new productive city? Case study of the spatial and functional change of the chosen Warsaw industrial sites after 1989

Abstract

Introduction: In 1989 in Poland the transition period was initiated, which caused a profound change not only of a political and institutional nature, but also an economic change of local labour markets and urban space. One of the most prominent change was de-industrialization, encompassing also the capital city. Case description:The paper describes the change of an area in Praga, developed for decades on the basis of industry and in last 25 years losing this character. 29 former factories have been identified and described, varying in current functions-from modern factories, to residential areas, to unused sites. There are several actors present: municipal, enterprises (both of local, country and international level), free-lancers and NGOs. The sites' transformation analysis was based on the public records, focus groups and interviews and professional experience. Discussion and evaluation:Authors present the changes in ownership and use and discuss the role of municipal and private actors in the structural and spatial change in the area. The case is presented within the framework of the productive city model and the relations between the local and supra-local context of the re-development. Conclusions:Analyzed area may profit of the delay in public and private investments by establishing new productive ventures, based on the existing tangible and intangible heritage of the place. Public sector should be the main player in such urban adaptive re-use. However, the authors found no coherent municipal policy towards the chosen sites, their heritage and potential. The existence of such a potential for modern form of a productive city and the need for new policies answering better to grass-root activities and socio-economic potential of the area is the main conclusion of the analysis. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Aesthetics, gentrification and new identities: the comparison of adaptive reuse practices in contemporary Budapest and Warsaw

“…Reinterpreting the intangible heritage of manufacturing and manual work in cities is, therefore, a complex issue, embedded in the changed economic reality, the revision or rejection of various political paradigms, and the evolving understanding of heritage. The criticism encompasses the change from the productive city into the consumerist city (Gleaser et al ., 1992; Sadowy and Lisiecki, 2019), the fragmentation of the urban space, the decrease of the public sphere (Sennett, 2003) or the destructive role of consumption in general. Change of use – like the loss of manufacturing sites and jobs –can be assessed as a threat to heritage, not just because of the physical harm to the place, but for the risk of loss of local community and/or local identity.…”

Mitigating tensions between ethics and aesthetics through community-led adaptive heritage reuse: the case of post-industrial Praga, Warsaw

“…Wola, Ursus) (Pawlikowska-Piechotka, 2010), it did not undergo the same rapid urban developments as in large parts of Warsaw (being one of the fastest developing cities in Europe) (Vetter, 2020). In fact, for a long time, Praga remained untouched by the developing city of Warsaw and retained much of its original architecture and character, even as the industrial sites were gradually losing their functions (Czeredys et al , 2020; Sadowy and Lisiecki, 2019). Over the past decades however, various investments like a new metro line, railway infrastructure, and investments in public spaces and municipal owned buildings, provided a gigantic stimulus for development and impacted the urban lay-out of the district.…”

Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia

“…The emphasis was also placed on the protection of these buildings. They possess not only architectural and aesthetic values, but represent an important segment of the cultural and social heritage, as well as the identity of the CEE region [66].…”