2020
DOI: 10.2172/1773801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Irradiation Examinations of the ATF Experiments - 2020 Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gamma spectrometry of the rodlets was performed using the HFEF Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS). Details about the system have been reported in other PIE reports [3,4]. The results of some of the principal gamma emitters generally used as burnup monitors are shown in Figure 8a through Figure 8g for each of the rodlets.…”
Section: Gamma Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamma spectrometry of the rodlets was performed using the HFEF Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS). Details about the system have been reported in other PIE reports [3,4]. The results of some of the principal gamma emitters generally used as burnup monitors are shown in Figure 8a through Figure 8g for each of the rodlets.…”
Section: Gamma Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first campaign, the rodlet ATF-8 (or G03) containing GNF UO 2 fuel was dry irradiated to 18.3 GWd/MTU. Post-irradiation examinations (PIE) showed no significant changes in the hardness of APMT cladding due to the neutron irradiation [22,58]. Moreover, there was no degradation of the APMT cladding from the fuel cavity due to interaction with the fuel [59].…”
Section: Irradiation Campaigns and Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%