A domain of erythropoietin (EPO), separate from the domain involved in red blood cell development, has been identified. This region of EPO has anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. Use of a peptide sequence from this region provides the potential for an effective therapeutic without effects on erythropoiesis.Keywords Erythropoietin . Neuroprotection . Multiple sclerosis . Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Although erythropoietin (EPO) is best known for its role in hematopoiesis, there are other functions that are instigated via this protein. EPO is effective as a neuroprotective molecule in various animal models of neuroinflammation and ischemia, including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), brain trauma, and stroke [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Fortunately, proteins are often divided into discrete domains with different functional activities residing in different regions of the molecule. In this issue of Neurotherapeutics, Yuan et al. [7] discuss how they were able to dissociate a domain of EPO with antiinflammatory and neuroprotective effects from the regions of the molecule responsible for erythropoiesis. The ability to isolate the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of the molecule from its effects on red blood cell (RBC) development might enable the design of potent guardian molecules for unmet neurologic needs, without the potential side effect of EPO causing polycythemia, hypertension, and stroke.Yuan et al.[7] devised a successful strategy to parse the domains of EPO that might be free of its effect on RBC mass, while still retaining its neuroprotective effects. They made a library of peptides of lengths ranging from 7 to 25 amino acids, containing 1-2 cysteines. A 19-mer peptide containing 2 cysteines, termed JM-4, gave the strongest results, with antiinflammatory and protective properties dissociated from effects on RBC mass. The JM-4 peptide is derived from the AB loop of EPO. Shorter linear peptides, and peptides without the cysteines, were far less effective. For example, a 17-mer peptide from the same region was far less effective [7].The diligence and persistence of Yuan et al. [7] were worthwhile: they learned that while the 19-mer JM-4 was effective in 2 models of EAE, they also discovered that a shorter 17-mer containing only 1 cysteine residue was far less effective in these models. Apparently, length mattered considerably in this case: incorporation of the second cysteine was critical for these protective effects. Further understanding of the structure/function relationships stemming from this observation is likely to be interesting and will illuminate how EPO interacts with its receptor to attenuate inflammation.Yuan et al. [7] were able to demonstrate the reversal of paralytic disease at the onset of symptoms without effects on RBC mass. Proinflammatory cytokine production was reduced. JM-4 protected against demyelination and axonal loss [7]. In addition, they showed that JM-4 protected from amyloid β-induced toxicity in an in vitro model, indicating t...