2015
DOI: 10.1080/02589346.2015.1005790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-liberation Democratic Authoritarianism: The Case of Namibia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in Comparative International Development (2024) 59:27-55 junctures in determining the success of a country's democratic development in rentier, post-conflict contexts. In addition, this article provides further evidence of how the political composition of liberation movements impacts post-independence governance by their successor parties (Dorman 2006;Melber 2015Melber , 2019Müller 2012). From a policy perspective, our research suggests that external actors can support the democratization process in adverse contexts of resource wealth and post-conflict reconstruction but should avoid "picking winners" or otherwise undermining democratic competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Studies in Comparative International Development (2024) 59:27-55 junctures in determining the success of a country's democratic development in rentier, post-conflict contexts. In addition, this article provides further evidence of how the political composition of liberation movements impacts post-independence governance by their successor parties (Dorman 2006;Melber 2015Melber , 2019Müller 2012). From a policy perspective, our research suggests that external actors can support the democratization process in adverse contexts of resource wealth and post-conflict reconstruction but should avoid "picking winners" or otherwise undermining democratic competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The SWAPO (South-West Africa People's Organisation) party, agitating for independence since the 1960s, held a two-third majority in parliament from 1994 to 2019. SWAPO governs Namibia by 'democratic authoritarianism', a form of administration and political culture combining elements of democracy and authoritarian rule (Melber, 2015). State-managed modernisation and a de-ethnicised, uniform national identity are key official projects designed to intensify the politics of belonging in independent Namibia (Forrest, 1994).…”
Section: Windhoek In Independent Namibiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Namibian state's actions have yet to reflect SWAPO's rhetoric that resources will be utilised for the benefit of "all Namibians", not least given that post-independence development has enabled the growth of a "parasitic class" that has come to appropriate public resources (Melber 2015). Despite being viewed internationally as a bastion for transparency in the extractive industry in Africa, Namibia's management of its mineral resources has been referred to as "opaque and vague" (Polus et al 2015: 44).…”
Section: One Namibia One Nation? 21mentioning
confidence: 99%