“…The apparent variability of mechanisms in the obligate parthenogens of the hybrid origin, based on the information available at the time in parthenogenetic Aspidoscelis and Darevskia lizards, led to the conclusion that "the mechanisms of meiosis in vertebrate parthenogens may not conform to a one-size-fits-all scenario" (Freitas et al, 2022). However, it seems that we need to revise this view: while terminal fusion and postmeiotic doubling connected with the loss of heterozygosity seem to be the mechanism of facultative parthenogenesis (Booth et al, 2012(Booth et al, , 2014Booth and Schuett, 2016;Kratochvíl et al, 2020;Ho et al, 2023), only premeiotic endoreplication is now known in obligate parthenogenetic vertebrates of hybrid origin. The same mechanism was uncovered in the studied representatives of eight or nine independent hybrid origins of obligate parthenogenesis: in the teiid diploids A. tesselata (Lutes et al, 2010) (1) and A. neomexicana (Newton et al, 2016) (2), in the triploid A. uniparens (Cuellar, 1971) and tetraploid A. priscillae originating from the laboratory cross of A. uniparens with a male of sexual diploid A. inornatus (Cole et al, 2017) (3), in the triploid geckos Heteronotia binoei (Dedukh et al, 2022) (4) and Hemiphyllodactylus typus (Dedukh et al, 2022) (5), in the diploid and triploid geckos Lepidodactylus lugubris (Dedukh et al, 2022) (6), and -as shown in this study, in the diploid lacertids D. unisexualis (7), D. dahli (8), and D. armeniaca (9 -depending on the mode of its origin, as it might inherited parthenogenesis from its already parthenogenetic ancestor; Tarkhnishvili et al, 2020).…”