1997
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.98.829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Newtonian Expansion of Gravitational Waves from a Particle in Circular Orbits around a Rotating Black Hole: Effects of Black Hole Absorption

Abstract: When a particle moves around a Kerr black hole, it radiates gravitational waves. Some of these waves are absorbed by the black hole. We calculate such absorption of gravitational waves induced by a particle of mass J1 in a circular orbit on an equatorial plane around a Kerr black hole of mass M. We assume that the velocity of the particle v is much smaller than the speed of light c and calculate the energy absorption rate analytically. We adopt an analytic technique for the Teukolsky equation developed by Mano… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
90
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
13
90
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They rapidly grow as ∆N Flux,5 ∼ ν −1 ln(ν) and ∆N Flux,7 ∼ ∆N SSS ∼ ν −5/4 as ν decreases, and their values become as large as O(10 3 ) ∼ O(10 4 ) when ν ∼ 10 −5 , depending on the values of χ 1,2 . While our results for high-mass-ratio inspirals (ν 10 −3 ) are only indicative because the PN approximation is not so accurate for these BBHs [89,90,91,92], these results are basically consistent with previous results made by many authors, which showed that for quasicircular, extreme mass-ratio BBH inspirals with ν ∼ 10 −6 and nearly extremal spins the horizon-flux effects significantly increases the duration of inspiral phase [65,68,69,70].…”
Section: Results 1: the Error In Gw Cyclessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They rapidly grow as ∆N Flux,5 ∼ ν −1 ln(ν) and ∆N Flux,7 ∼ ∆N SSS ∼ ν −5/4 as ν decreases, and their values become as large as O(10 3 ) ∼ O(10 4 ) when ν ∼ 10 −5 , depending on the values of χ 1,2 . While our results for high-mass-ratio inspirals (ν 10 −3 ) are only indicative because the PN approximation is not so accurate for these BBHs [89,90,91,92], these results are basically consistent with previous results made by many authors, which showed that for quasicircular, extreme mass-ratio BBH inspirals with ν ∼ 10 −6 and nearly extremal spins the horizon-flux effects significantly increases the duration of inspiral phase [65,68,69,70].…”
Section: Results 1: the Error In Gw Cyclessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…While their expressions at the relative 1.5PN order do not recover the expressions in the test-particle limit ν → 0 [65,68] † †, for the purpose of our analysis at the 3.5PN accuracy level, we only need them up to the relative 1PN order that do agree with the test-mass results. Importing the results in (42) and (43) of [62], the horizon energy and angular-momentum fluxes for the spinning, non-precessing, quasicircular BBH are defined by…”
Section: The Horizon Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, it should likely be possible to develop a similar simplifying factorization for the horizon-absorbed flux (for Kerr or Schwarzschild) for circular, equatorial orbits. This flux has recently been calculated to 8PN by Fujita [31] completely analytically (again significantly improving upon the previous 4PN accurate calculation by Tagoshi, Mano, and Takasugi [34]), and has also been calculated numerically (again with analytic forms determined for some coefficients) to 20PN by Shah [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We thus are unable to determine q ℓm for ℓ ≥ 7 and s ℓ for ℓ ≥ 5 from the 22PN energy flux expressions: For q 77 , we would need to know the v 36 term inη 77 , but only know this through v 34 . Similarly, for s 5 , we would need to know, e.g., the v 39 term ofη 55 but only know this through v 38 .…”
Section: Simplifying the Modes Of The Energy Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[66] included the spinning horizon flux in an EOB model, using the Taylor-expanded expressions of Refs. [67,68]; the inclusion of absorption turned out to be important to obtain good agreement with the full Teukolsky flux, at least up to the ISCO. When modeling spinning binaries, one should bear in mind that the spin changes the PN order (with respect to the leading order flux at infinity) at which absorption enters in the energy flux: while this effect enters at 4PN order for Schwarzschild BHs, it enters at 2.5PN order for nonzero spin.…”
Section: The Comparable-mass Effective-one-body Model In the Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%