2022
DOI: 10.1002/lary.30219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post‐operative Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Following Facial Reconstruction With Fibula Free Flaps

Abstract: Educational Objective Assess outcomes of pediatric facial reconstruction with fibula free flaps. Objectives Free flap reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects in pediatric patients is rare. Post‐operative complications, donor site morbidity, impact on craniofacial growth, and oro‐dental rehabilitation are unknown. Our study assesses the outcomes of pediatric maxillofacial reconstruction with composite fibula free flaps. Study Design Retrospective chart review. Methods Multi‐institutional retrospective c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety and efficacy of fibula free flap reconstruction for pediatric maxillomandibular defects was recently evaluated in multi-institutional retrospective study by Slijepcevic et al 28 Pre and post-operative chemotherapy did not appear to affect long-term wound healing in pediatric maxillomandibular reconstruction using a FFF, with minimal instances of hardware exposure reported. 28 Post-operative complications within 30 and 90 days occurred in less than 10% to 20% of patients, with only 1 free flap failure reported, with donor site complications occurring in less than 10% of patients. Dental rehabilitation was completed in a third of patients, and long-term craniofacial growth abnormalities occurred in a quarter of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The safety and efficacy of fibula free flap reconstruction for pediatric maxillomandibular defects was recently evaluated in multi-institutional retrospective study by Slijepcevic et al 28 Pre and post-operative chemotherapy did not appear to affect long-term wound healing in pediatric maxillomandibular reconstruction using a FFF, with minimal instances of hardware exposure reported. 28 Post-operative complications within 30 and 90 days occurred in less than 10% to 20% of patients, with only 1 free flap failure reported, with donor site complications occurring in less than 10% of patients. Dental rehabilitation was completed in a third of patients, and long-term craniofacial growth abnormalities occurred in a quarter of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients who had dental implantation at the time of fibula reconstruction did not demonstrate long-term craniofacial asymmetries or disturbances of maxillomandibular growth. 28 While functional outcomes such as speech and oral competency are independent of dental implantation, immediate dental implantation may be important for long-term facial growth outcomes and may be indicated before skeletal maturity is realized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, both FFF and ICF procedures carry the risk of vascular embolism, flap necrosis, and postoperative complications in the donor area, which may reduce the patient’s quality of life. According to recent research, individuals who receive either FFF or ICF procedures may have reduced joint range of motion, sensory impairments in the donor site, loading pain, and limited movement following surgery [ 18 20 ]. In contrast, posterior iliac cancellous bone can be utilized as a donor site in maxillofacial reconstruction, especially when restoring alveolar height deficits [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both FFF and ICF procedures carry the risk of vascular embolism, ap necrosis, and postoperative complications in the donor area, which may harm the patient's quality of life. According to recent research, individuals who receive either FFF or ICF procedures have been found to commonly experience a reduced joint range of motion, sensory impairments in the donor site, loading pain, and limited movement following surgery [15][16][17]. However, iliac cancellous bone is widely used as a donor site for correcting maxillofacial bone defects, especially posterior iliac bone [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%