2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04420-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-operative urinary retention after lower extremity arthroplasty and the peri-operative role of selective alpha-1 adrenergic blocking agents in adult male patients: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our meta-analysis of RCTs contradicts the results of a propensity-matched retrospective study that demonstrated a significant 12.1 per cent decrease in the risk of POUR 32 . Although the study controlled various confounding factors through a propensity score and an adjusted analysis, a myriad of risk factors may be undetected due to the nature of the retrospective study, further contributing to unmeasured confounding bias 33 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Our meta-analysis of RCTs contradicts the results of a propensity-matched retrospective study that demonstrated a significant 12.1 per cent decrease in the risk of POUR 32 . Although the study controlled various confounding factors through a propensity score and an adjusted analysis, a myriad of risk factors may be undetected due to the nature of the retrospective study, further contributing to unmeasured confounding bias 33 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…We published also papers related to the use of drugs or medications before or after surgery as well as regional anaesthetic blocks [8][9][10][11]. However, the most read and cited borderline papers are dedicated to pain management and blood loss as well as the outcome studies in controversial subjects [12][13][14][15]. Some of the published papers were dedicated to analgesia and anaesthesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of POUR in the literature is highly variable, ranging from 5.5% to 46.3% (Table 1). 1,2,4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] One reason for this wide variation is that there currently exists no standardized definition or criteria for POUR. In the literature, POUR is commonly assessed by performing a bladder scan 4 to 6 hours postoperatively and catheterizing patients if the volume of urine in the bladder exceeds 400 mL.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%