2011
DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2011.596425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Political Poisons? Evaluating the ‘Toxic’ Dimensions of Tony Blair's Leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 49 On Labour’s vulnerability once dependent on Blair’s charisma, and on the drop in party membership and support suffered once his leadership became ‘toxic’ after the Iraq war, see McAnulla (2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 49 On Labour’s vulnerability once dependent on Blair’s charisma, and on the drop in party membership and support suffered once his leadership became ‘toxic’ after the Iraq war, see McAnulla (2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend is reflected in a growing body of literature on toxic/bad/destructive leadership indicating that political scientists are beginning to appropriate tools and concepts previously confined to the business sphere. Thus McAnulla's (2011) analysis of Blair's leadership draws the "toxic triangle" model of destructive leadership from management studies experts Padilla, Hogan and Kaiser (2007), while Tim Heppell (2011) borrows from business academic Lipman-Blumen (2004) to test the applicability of the concept of "toxicity" to the study of five controversial political leaders, including Tony Blair. This coincides with the recent rise of critical approaches to leadership which emphasize destructive leaders' behaviour, underlining the destructive dimension of charismatic leadership (Collinson, 2012;Kellerman, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%