2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10030472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Processing Approach for Refining Raw Land Cover Change Detection of Very High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images

Abstract: Abstract:In recent decades, land cover change detection (LCCD) using very high-spatial resolution (VHR) remote sensing images has been a major research topic. However, VHR remote sensing images usually lead to a large amount of noises in spectra, thereby reducing the reliability of the detected results. To solve this problem, this study proposes an object-based expectation maximization (OBEM) post-processing approach for enhancing raw LCCD results. OBEM defines a refinement of the labeling in a detected map to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When fusing based on the wDST, the segmentation image was generated by allocating the scale parameter as 500. To evaluate the performance of the proposed OBCD method, three PBCD results (i.e., CVA [15], IRMAD [40], and PCA [41]) prior to fusion and their extended OBCD results using the majority voting technique [28] were generated for a comparison purpose. Additionally, three PBCD results were combined with the dual majority voting technique to generate the OBCD result [29].…”
Section: Experiments On the First Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When fusing based on the wDST, the segmentation image was generated by allocating the scale parameter as 500. To evaluate the performance of the proposed OBCD method, three PBCD results (i.e., CVA [15], IRMAD [40], and PCA [41]) prior to fusion and their extended OBCD results using the majority voting technique [28] were generated for a comparison purpose. Additionally, three PBCD results were combined with the dual majority voting technique to generate the OBCD result [29].…”
Section: Experiments On the First Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using a pixel as the basic unit for CD, using an object, which is a group of pixels that are spatially adjacent and spectrally similar to each other [23], as a basic unit can be a solution for minimizing problems with the VHR image CD [24]. Object-based change detection (OBCD) extracts meaningful objects by segmenting input images and, thus, is consistent with the original idea of using CD to identify differences in the state of an observed object or phenomenon [1,25,26].Based on our review of the literature, the OBCD methods can be categorized into two groups: (1) fusing spatial features, which takes into consideration of the texture, shape, and topology features of the objects, in the process of change analysis [23,24,27]; and (2) utilizing the object as the process unit to improve the completeness and accuracy of the final result [28][29][30]. Many studies have focused on using the spatial features of the objects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantitatively evaluate the accuracy and performance of each approach, the following three standard measures, which have been used in published literature [42], were employed: (1) false alarm rate (FA): FA = N uc N TC 脳 100%; (2) missed alarm rate (MA): MA = N cu N TU 脳 100%; and (3) total error (TE): TE = N uc +N cu N TC +N TU 脳 100%, where N uc is the number of unchanged pixels detected as change pixels, N TC is the total number of changed pixels within THE ground reference map; N cu is the number of changed pixels detected as unchanged pixels; and N TU is the total number of unchanged pixels within the ground reference map.…”
Section: Evaluation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, various LCCD techniques have been developed and applied in practice [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Two main steps are usually related to these methods, i.e., the generation of a change magnitude image (CMI) and the use of a binary threshold to divide the CMI into a binary change detention map (BCDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%