2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-013-0219-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Processing of Phased-Array Ultrasonic Inspection Data with Parallel Computing for Nondestructive Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results indicate the fused image achieves better localization performance than the individual images, the fused image may fail to detect the damage under the employed fusion scheme if there is no damage shown in the individual images. In Guan et al, 181 the maximum and the average data fusion strategy are used to postprocess the phased-array ultrasonic inspection data. Results indicate that the average fusion scheme produces a clearer visualization for the ultrasonic data.…”
Section: Data Fusion Techniques In Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the results indicate the fused image achieves better localization performance than the individual images, the fused image may fail to detect the damage under the employed fusion scheme if there is no damage shown in the individual images. In Guan et al, 181 the maximum and the average data fusion strategy are used to postprocess the phased-array ultrasonic inspection data. Results indicate that the average fusion scheme produces a clearer visualization for the ultrasonic data.…”
Section: Data Fusion Techniques In Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it can sweep a sectorial domain at one time, and by moving the probe, the same internal location can be interrogated from multiple directions and locations [16][17][18]. Consequently, the reliability of damage detections can greatly be improved [19,20]. In addition, the efficiency and flexibility of the ultrasound phased array also allow for rapid inspections of material blocks, reducing the overall inspection time [18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the main methods of nondestructive testing are the X-ray methods, magnetic and electromagnetic ones, the metal magnetic memory method, and the acoustic methods. The most efficient methods to control defects located at large distances from the surface are the acoustic ones [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Analysis of acoustic methods showed that the most satisfactory method to assess the quality of a roll and to control the presence of defects (for example, cracks) in the surface layer of work rolls for cold-rolling mills is the echo method in jet variant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%