Abstract. In these afterthoughts to a themed issue on the „Geographies of
Post-Secularity“, I critically interrogate the analytical purchase of
the terminology of post-secularism. I suggest that the concept of the
post-secular is ill-suited to provide a vocabulary for multi-religious
societies in the West as much as elsewhere. Instead, I suggest that the
vocabulary of a descriptive political theology (Assmann) better helps us
grasp the continuing negotiation of the dialectic relations between the
secular and the religious. I illustrate this conceptual vocabulary for the
study of religion and politics in the postcolonial world, first, in the
political-normative debates on Indian secularism, and second, in the everyday
struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil
war, to then return to debates on (post-) secularity. I conclude that,
indeed, we have never been secular – that the dialectic relations between
the secular and the religious are bound to remain, and to become further
complicated in increasingly multi-religious societies.