2022
DOI: 10.21557/ssc.74941708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Soviet De Facto States: Trajectories of Their Struggle for Sovereignty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful control of a defined territory and consolidation of state authority should be considered a characteristic of these entities. In addition, de facto state authorities take action to create foreign policy by, for example, establishing permanent diplomatic representations in various countries, participating in peace negotiations to determine their status (Markedonov 2012). De facto states, such as the Republic of Abkhazia and the Republic of South Ossetia, have achieved limited international recognition, including that of the permanent United Nations Security Council (UNSC) member power, the Russian Federation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful control of a defined territory and consolidation of state authority should be considered a characteristic of these entities. In addition, de facto state authorities take action to create foreign policy by, for example, establishing permanent diplomatic representations in various countries, participating in peace negotiations to determine their status (Markedonov 2012). De facto states, such as the Republic of Abkhazia and the Republic of South Ossetia, have achieved limited international recognition, including that of the permanent United Nations Security Council (UNSC) member power, the Russian Federation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%