2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-tillage evolution of structural pore space and saturated and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity in a clay loam soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large within ‐treatment variations are commonly reported and have been suggested to hamper the identification of treatment effects (e.g. Luo et al ., ; Sandin et al ., ). All quantitative data on macropore network characteristics are presented in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Large within ‐treatment variations are commonly reported and have been suggested to hamper the identification of treatment effects (e.g. Luo et al ., ; Sandin et al ., ). All quantitative data on macropore network characteristics are presented in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The accessibility of macropore networks is particularly important for the flow of water, nutrients and air through the soils, although they comprise only a small fraction of total porosity. A macropore network with large accessibility increases the rate of infiltration and reduces surface runoff (Sandin, Koestel, Jarvis, & Larsbo, ), whereas a macropore network with small accessibility decreases the emission of GHGs (greenhouse gases) (Rabot, Lacoste, Henault, & Cousin, ), decreases air permeability and cuts off the water transport to deeper soil layers (Paradelo et al, ). Accessibility of the macropore network in this study was evaluated by the pore network model and network analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the effects of soil spatial heterogeneity, the temporal variability of soil properties in the field could have a major impact on soil water retention (e.g., Horn, 2004; Jirků et al, 2013; Sandin et al, 2017). In contrast, the laboratory water retention function represented only a single pore structural state at the time of sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water retention dynamics could be related to tillage effects (e.g., Strudley et al, 2008); intraseasonal changes of soil water retention as a result of swelling and shrinkage, wetting and drying, tillage, or changes in management (e.g., Jirků et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2015; Sandin et al, 2017) could cause the formation of new pores or aggregates and the closing or modification of existing pores by crop roots (Wang et al, 2015). For an intensively cultivated postglacial landscape as exemplified in the present study, the water retention dynamics could be more complex because of erosion‐induced pedogenetic modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%