“…Publications have appeared from Australia (De Campo & revealed a dichotomy of opinion. On the one hand, radiologists believe that skull X-rays are over-used in head-injured patients, rarely affect management decisions, rarely show positive findings and are generally wasteful of resources (Bell & Loop, 1971;Roberts & Shopfner, 1972;Eyes & Evans, 1978;Royal College of Radiologists, 1981;Phillips, 1979;Masters, 1980). The opposing view, usually expressed by neurosurgeons and accident surgeons, is that plain skull films are indispensable in that they help to identify patients at risk from complications such as intracranial haematoma (Jennett, 1980;Galbraith, 1976;Galbraith, 1973;Mendelow et al, 1983;Briggs et al, 1984) or infection (Miller & Jennett, 1968;Jennett & Miller, 1972;Sande et al, 1980, Briggs, 1974, and may allow the identification of patients requiring admission who would otherwise be discharged (Jennett, 1980;Mendelow et al, 1983;Briggs et al, 1984) or, conversely, allow the safer discharge of patients who might otherwise be admitted (Jennett, 1980;Mendelow et al, 1983;Briggs et al, 1984).…”