2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms in Secondary Stalked Children of Danish Stalking Survivors—A Pilot Study

Abstract: There is a lack of research examining secondary stalking and its effect on children who, in many cases, can be direct targets, or secondary survivors, of the stalking of their parent. The present study examines trauma reactions in children of stalking survivors in a Danish sample. It investigates the differences and similarities of such reactions across three age groups. Fifty-seven children were divided into groups depending on their age. The symptoms of the youngest group, 0–6-year-olds, were investigated by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinction between on-line and off-line stalking is porous (Sheridan and Grant, 2007;Southworth et al, 2007;Ahlgrim and Terrance, 2021;Harris and Woodlock, 2019), and the digital dimension can heighten the common impacts of stalking (Aghtaie et al, 2018;Marganski and Melander, 2018;Henry et al, 2020). Stalkers can use digital data to identify the victim's location, making themselves 'omnipresent' and intensifying the continual fear felt by both adult and child victims (Nikupeteri and Laitinen, 2015;Woodlock, 2017;Worsley et al, 2017;Elklit et al, 2019). Meanwhile, victims may, for example, avoid events or meetings that could appear on social media (Woodlock, 2017;Douglas et al, 2019;Al-Alosi, 2020;Woodlock et al, 2020).…”
Section: Coercive Control Technology-facilitated Stalking and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The distinction between on-line and off-line stalking is porous (Sheridan and Grant, 2007;Southworth et al, 2007;Ahlgrim and Terrance, 2021;Harris and Woodlock, 2019), and the digital dimension can heighten the common impacts of stalking (Aghtaie et al, 2018;Marganski and Melander, 2018;Henry et al, 2020). Stalkers can use digital data to identify the victim's location, making themselves 'omnipresent' and intensifying the continual fear felt by both adult and child victims (Nikupeteri and Laitinen, 2015;Woodlock, 2017;Worsley et al, 2017;Elklit et al, 2019). Meanwhile, victims may, for example, avoid events or meetings that could appear on social media (Woodlock, 2017;Douglas et al, 2019;Al-Alosi, 2020;Woodlock et al, 2020).…”
Section: Coercive Control Technology-facilitated Stalking and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perpetrators often exploit children in their stalking behaviour, and children can also be targets of stalking themselves. The father's/father figure's stalking behaviour produces feelings of insecurity and fear in children and severely constrains their everyday lives (Nikupeteri and Laitinen, 2015;Elklit et al, 2019). However, so far we lack knowledge of how children can be exposed to the technology-facilitated aspects of stalking perpetrated by a parent in this post-separation context.…”
Section: Coercive Control Technology-facilitated Stalking and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Elklit et al. ( 2019 ), the outcomes of parental stalking for children involve complex, multiple‐event, and continuous trauma. In their study, which involved 57 children, 56% met the diagnostic criteria for post‐traumatic stress disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, children experience and express the symptoms differently depending on age and developmental stage [39]. See Elklit et al [40] for a thorough comparison across preschool children (age 0-6 years), school children (age 7-11 years), and adolescents (age 12-18 years).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%