2016
DOI: 10.1177/0266382116680741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post truth, information, and emotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
23
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…3p. 61;Laybats & Tredinnik, 2016;Mair, 2017, p. 3). This is, in a nutshell, the gist of the post-truth discourse permeating contemporary media environments.…”
Section: Post-truth Discourse As a Challenge For Fictionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3p. 61;Laybats & Tredinnik, 2016;Mair, 2017, p. 3). This is, in a nutshell, the gist of the post-truth discourse permeating contemporary media environments.…”
Section: Post-truth Discourse As a Challenge For Fictionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The post-truth society has been posited as a new phenomenon (Laybats and Tredinnick 2016). The framing adopted in this study is founded on contemporary contexts for trustworthiness and trust, and recognises the importance of public communication and the need for decision-making to occur within a dynamic, complex space of negotiation, debate and conflict (Cox 2012).…”
Section: How Trust Is Affected By Communication and Information Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLO has been defined as broad public acceptance of a company or industry's development activities and is linked to public trust and confidence in their ability to 'do the right thing' (Morrison 2014, Parsons et al 2014. This re-emergence of the value of building trust is particularly important in what some term a post-truth era, which is characterised by populist appeals to emotion and the proliferation of information and misinformation (Laybats and Tredinnick 2016). Post-truth is claimed to significantly damage the foundations of trust that are required in a robust society (Keyes 2004) and points to a need to re-examine the issues of trust and public-private engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fleksibilitas dan fraksinasi yang ditawarkan oleh media sosial telah memungkinkan orang untuk memilih ruang gema karena sebagian besar informasi tersedia -sesuai dengan sikap yang sudah ada sebelumnya. Salah satu konsekuensi dari paparan media sosial tersebut lebih pada pembentukan kepercayaan yang tidak akurat; bahkan ketika bukti yang relevan dipahami dengan benar (Garrett, Weeks, dan Neo, 2016;Laybats dan Tredinnick, 2016). Dengan demikian, komunitas atau anggota dalam media sosial akan melakukan validasi diri dalam gelembung-gelembung udaranya sendiri.…”
Section: Media Sosial Mengatasi Kelesuan Produksi Dan Distribusi Postunclassified