2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postaccumulation sandstone porosity evolution by mechanical compaction and the effect on gas saturation: Case study of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the Bayan'aobao area, Ordos Basin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the compaction transformation, the intergranular porosity of the reservoir sandstone is significantly reduced. The porosity lost due to compaction is greater overall compared to that lost due to cementation (Xia et al, 2020).The porosity loss after compaction ranges between 16.0% and 27.9%, while the compaction rate falls between 40.0% and 69.8%, indicating a medium compaction diagenetic facies. The carbonate cement in the main area of Wenchang A oil field mainly consists of iron calcite, along with iron dolomite, siderite, glauconite, pyrite, and other minerals.…”
Section: Porosity and Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After the compaction transformation, the intergranular porosity of the reservoir sandstone is significantly reduced. The porosity lost due to compaction is greater overall compared to that lost due to cementation (Xia et al, 2020).The porosity loss after compaction ranges between 16.0% and 27.9%, while the compaction rate falls between 40.0% and 69.8%, indicating a medium compaction diagenetic facies. The carbonate cement in the main area of Wenchang A oil field mainly consists of iron calcite, along with iron dolomite, siderite, glauconite, pyrite, and other minerals.…”
Section: Porosity and Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Ordos Basin continued to uplift as a result of the subduction of the paleo-Pacific Plate and Indian Plate since the Late Cretaceous [24]. It is widely accepted that the current underpressure and normal pressure in the Upper Paleozoic strata were the results of large-scale tectonic uplifting and denudation [16,55,61,62]. The temperature decrease, pore rebound, and natural gas dissipation during the uplifting stage were the main causes of the depressurization [55,63].…”
Section: Origin Of the Abnormal Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stratum uplifting and denudation can lead to unloading of overburden pressure, which will increase the pore space and reduce the pore pressure [65]. Therefore, the depressurization resulting from pore rebound was closely related to the erosion thickness of the stratum [62,63]. The pore pressure in the sandstones decreased more intensively than that in the mudstones due to pore rebound, forming a pressure difference between source rock layers and reservoirs to promote gas expulsion and charging during the uplifting stage [61].…”
Section: Origin Of the Abnormal Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%