2014
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postapprenticeship Isocyanate Exposure and Risk of Work-Related Respiratory Symptoms Using an Asthma-Specific Job Exposure Matrix, Self-Reported and Expert-Rated Exposure Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The description of demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were published somewhere. 4 Overall, there were 86 subjects classified as non-exposed while 95 as exposed to isocyanates based on both JEMs. Only five subjects were classified as non-exposed based on the first JEM but had a medium exposure to isocyanate based on the new OAsJEM (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The description of demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were published somewhere. 4 Overall, there were 86 subjects classified as non-exposed while 95 as exposed to isocyanates based on both JEMs. Only five subjects were classified as non-exposed based on the first JEM but had a medium exposure to isocyanate based on the new OAsJEM (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lama et al 4 reported good agreements between self-reporting, investigator scoring, and the first JEM in identifying isocyanates exposure. A study investigating the association between exposures and asthma in healthcare workers found that the agreement between self-reporting and job-task-exposure-matrix especially in cleaning products, adhesives/solvents, and gases/vapors exposures were close to each other 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The other prospective cohort studies either examined the first years following the end of training (15) or did not exclusively recruit individuals at the beginning of their careers (16,17). There were also 2 publications on a retrospective cohort (18, 19) and 5 case-control studies (20-24); some of the latter were part of the cohort studies already mentioned (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Airway Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%