2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1059-941x(03)00010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postcementation hypersensitivity: Scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions

Abstract: Comparing respondents' opinions with published clinical studies, the incidence of postcementation sensitivity appears to be underestimated. There is little published evidence to support the importance of antimicrobials, desensitizing, or bonding agents, although these are considered effective by some dentists. Many respondents consider luting agent to be an important variable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rosenstiel et al 13 in his study, showed that the incidence of this postoperative complication is usually underestimated by most dentists. The factors considered 'very important' in reducing sensitivity by more than 50% of the respondents to his survey study were desiccation, luting agent, occlusion, provisional and water spray.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Rosenstiel et al 13 in his study, showed that the incidence of this postoperative complication is usually underestimated by most dentists. The factors considered 'very important' in reducing sensitivity by more than 50% of the respondents to his survey study were desiccation, luting agent, occlusion, provisional and water spray.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data support the null hypothesis of the study, that dentin desensitizer and dentin bonding agent would have no influence on complete cast crown postoperative sensitivity. Many treatment modalities and agents have been used in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, but the efficacy of most of them has been varied and not well established 18 . Specific studies on attempts to avoid the incidence of postoperative sensitivity in vivo following permanent cementation are very few and limited to providing an evaluation of these processes 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Various attempts have been made to reduce postoperative sensitivity, particularly in the choice of operative technique and the copious use of water cooling during tooth reduction. 11,18 Nevertheless, replacing a thermally insulating substance with a conducting metal can make prevention of thermal irritation a challenge, particularly after the pulpal tissues have suffered the insult of tooth preparation. 19 Traditionally two or three thin coats of a copal/ether varnish have been used under amalgam and crowns to provide a barrier against sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its primary indication is for metal and porcelain fused to metal restorations. 15 The material experiences a sudden set but continues to mature over several months prior to completion.…”
Section: Glass-ionomer Cementsmentioning
confidence: 99%