2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-31299-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postdigital Research in Education: Towards Vulnerable Method and Praxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not aim to teach people how to solve certain types of problems, because of its core educational focus on dispositions. Thus, it eschews a product-based (knowledge as commodity) model of education, embracing vulnerability and uncertainty needed in postdigital education-being open to uncertainty in addressing a problem and 'developing a reflective approach to teaching' (Jopling 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not aim to teach people how to solve certain types of problems, because of its core educational focus on dispositions. Thus, it eschews a product-based (knowledge as commodity) model of education, embracing vulnerability and uncertainty needed in postdigital education-being open to uncertainty in addressing a problem and 'developing a reflective approach to teaching' (Jopling 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such 'flat ontology' assumes 'distributed agency.' Although I agree with Reader in that '[p]ostdigital research will benefit from this philosophical approach as it tackles the role of both human and nonhuman agents' ( 229), I feel that flat ontologies and distributed agencies are more tangibly elaborated in some previous chapters that draw inspiration from ANT or Assemblage Theory (Gourlay 2023;Jopling 2023;Mörtsell and Gunnarsson 2023).…”
Section: Postdigital Agencies: Rounding Off the Postdigitalmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…What we care about is profoundly embedded in our biographies, our experiences, and our sensibilities, which in turn are infused with the digital. Jopling (2023) and Mörtsell and Gunnarsson (2023) convince me to solemnly embrace the ambiguity of the postdigital as much as the resulting insecurity as an emerging researcher. My insecurities and vulnerabilities are not evil spirits but a method.…”
Section: Postdigital Sensibilities: Being Vulnerable and Carefulmentioning
confidence: 99%