Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development

Abstract

The doctoral advisor—typically the principal investigator (PI)—is often characterized as a singular or primary mentor who guides students using a cognitive apprenticeship model. Alternatively, the “cascading mentorship” model describes the members of laboratories or research groups receiving mentorship from more senior laboratory members and providing it to more junior members (i.e., PIs mentor postdocs, postdocs mentor senior graduate students, senior students mentor junior students, etc.). Here we show that PIs’ laboratory and mentoring activities do not significantly predict students’ skill development trajectories, but the engagement of postdocs and senior graduate students in laboratory interactions do. We found that the cascading mentorship model accounts best for doctoral student skill development in a longitudinal study of 336 PhD students in the United States. Specifically, when postdocs and senior doctoral students actively participate in laboratory discussions, junior PhD students are over 4 times as likely to have positive skill development trajectories. Thus, postdocs disproportionately enhance the doctoral training enterprise, despite typically having no formal mentorship role. These findings also illustrate both the importance and the feasibility of identifying evidence-based practices in graduate education.

From Work Well-Being to Burnout: A Hypothetical Phase Model

“…Although engagement represents a healthy and positive state of well-being (Feldon et al, 2019), engaged employees need to mobilize resources to face job demands, giving rise to a state of activation-tension. Glucocorticoids, among other mediators, participate in an orchestrated manner in this state.…”

Ten Simple Rules for a successful remote postdoc

“…One of the central roles played by postdocs is their vital role as mentors of more junior lab members [10]. Working remotely doesn't mean postdocs can't participate in lab discussions, build lab community, or provide direct mentorship to junior lab members.…”

Leveraging a collaborative consortium model of mentee/mentor training to foster career progression of underrepresented postdoctoral researchers and promote institutional diversity and inclusion

“…The goal is to empower postdocs to be active participants in their mentoring relationships by emphasizing the mentees' contributions in shaping more productive interactions that then can be built upon to develop their own skills as a future mentor. A more recent study reported a positive link between students' skill development trajectory and the active engagement of postdoctoral researchers in lab discussions, although postdocs typically have no formal mentor role [15] and little formal mentorship training [16]. Thus, further examination of the impact of exposure to mentor competencies on postdocs' personal and professional career development via the validated but under-utilized "Mentoring-Up" training program is warranted.…”

“…improve retention in academia [ 27 ]. More recent studies have shown effective mentorship is increasingly correlated with enhanced mentee productivity, persistence, self-efficacy, career satisfaction and success [ 15 , 16 ]. As a result of these demonstrated positive outcomes, research mentor training, with a focus on mentor facilitator training at the faculty level to promote dissemination and implementation broadly, has increased [ 28 – 30 ].…”