Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing - SC '06 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1188455.1188605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poster reception---Scalable compression and replay of communication traces in massively parallel environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work, we observed that for our inter-node compression techniques the applications mapped into these three categories as follows [20]: DT, EP, and IS exhibited near-constant trace sizes irrespective of number of tasks; LU and MG showed sub-linear scaling with number of tasks; and BT, CG, and FT resulted in faster growing non-scalable traces sizes. Using our second generation algorithm describe in Sections 2 and 3) we significantly improved these results further, with the exception of IS, as described below.…”
Section: Trace Sizes and Memory Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous work, we observed that for our inter-node compression techniques the applications mapped into these three categories as follows [20]: DT, EP, and IS exhibited near-constant trace sizes irrespective of number of tasks; LU and MG showed sub-linear scaling with number of tasks; and BT, CG, and FT resulted in faster growing non-scalable traces sizes. Using our second generation algorithm describe in Sections 2 and 3) we significantly improved these results further, with the exception of IS, as described below.…”
Section: Trace Sizes and Memory Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A first-generation algorithm described in prior work [20] traversed both master and slave queues. If a subsequence of events between the queues matched, the slave events were combined with the master events by merging participant lists (node IDs of master and slave).…”
Section: Location-independent Encodingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, simple algorithms to achieve this are at least quadratic in trace length and hence impractical for long traces. A practical tradeoff is to limit the window size for substring matching, which again risks missing long span loops [9].…”
Section: Trace Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying problems addressed in skeleton construction have many aspects in common with on-the-fly trace compression methods, in particular the work presented in [9,10]. However, the approaches are algorithmically different; specifically the approach presented performs logicalization first and compresses only the logical trace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These construct correspond to the code in Figure 1. The algorithmic details of MPI event compressions over PRSDs can be found elsewhere [7,8].…”
Section: Lossless Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%