2018
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Cervical Keyhole Laminoforaminotomy: A Cadaveric Comparative Study to Evaluate Limits of Bony Resection

Abstract: Large KH defects involving both upper and lower laminae and facets can expose the roots to greater extent than small KH defects at C3-4, C5-6, and C6-7 levels. Large KH defects may allow better exposure of nerve roots axillae than small KH defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foraminal or extra-foraminal stenosis and disc extrusion are risk factors for facet joint violation; therefore, ACF is widely accepted as a standard treatment option for such cases 17) . However, massive facet violation during PCF can be avoided by widening the vertical width during foraminotomy with inferior lamina resection, making PCF a viable option for these types of pathologies 2) . To evaluate the feasibility of this approach, the study population was divided into two groups, namely the paracentral (group P) and foraminal (group F), based on the location of the pathology and the clinical and radiologic outcomes in the two groups were compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraminal or extra-foraminal stenosis and disc extrusion are risk factors for facet joint violation; therefore, ACF is widely accepted as a standard treatment option for such cases 17) . However, massive facet violation during PCF can be avoided by widening the vertical width during foraminotomy with inferior lamina resection, making PCF a viable option for these types of pathologies 2) . To evaluate the feasibility of this approach, the study population was divided into two groups, namely the paracentral (group P) and foraminal (group F), based on the location of the pathology and the clinical and radiologic outcomes in the two groups were compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%