Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundA blood‐based biomarker that accurately reflects neuronal injury in acute ischemic stroke could be an easily accessible and cost‐effective complement to clinical and radiological evaluation. Here, we investigate whether plasma levels of the novel biomarker brain‐derived tau (BD‐tau) reflect cerebral infarct volumes and whether BD‐tau can improve clinical outcome prediction.MethodsThe present study included 713 consecutive cases from two different hospital‐based cohorts, the Sahlgrenska Academy Study on Ischemic Stroke (SAHLSIS) and SAHLSIS phase 2 (SAHLSIS2). Acute stroke severity was determined by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale converted to the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) in SAHLSIS and by the NIHSS in SAHLSIS2. All participants were assessed for functional outcome 3 months after stroke by the modified Rankin Scale, and 254 participants in SAHLSIS had quantitative neuroimaging available.FindingsPlasma BD‐tau concentrations and cerebral infarct volumes were highly correlated (ρ 0.72, p < 0.001). BD‐tau improved the prognostic accuracy of suffering an unfavorable outcome over age and stroke severity in the whole cohort. However, the gain in predictive power was dependent on stroke severity and infarct location. The largest improvement was observed for mild ischemic strokes (NIHSS <5; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73 for age + NIHSS versus AUC = 0.84 with addition of BD‐tau; DeLong p 0.02), posterior circulation stroke (AUC = 0.75 vs. AUC = 0.84; DeLong p 0.06) and more specifically for infarcts in the brainstem/cerebellum (AUC = 0.74 vs. 0.87; DeLong p 0.009).ConclusionPlasma BD‐tau can provide information on the extent of acute neuronal damage in ischemic stroke and adds prognostic value for outcome, especially for mild and posterior circulation strokes.
BackgroundA blood‐based biomarker that accurately reflects neuronal injury in acute ischemic stroke could be an easily accessible and cost‐effective complement to clinical and radiological evaluation. Here, we investigate whether plasma levels of the novel biomarker brain‐derived tau (BD‐tau) reflect cerebral infarct volumes and whether BD‐tau can improve clinical outcome prediction.MethodsThe present study included 713 consecutive cases from two different hospital‐based cohorts, the Sahlgrenska Academy Study on Ischemic Stroke (SAHLSIS) and SAHLSIS phase 2 (SAHLSIS2). Acute stroke severity was determined by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale converted to the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) in SAHLSIS and by the NIHSS in SAHLSIS2. All participants were assessed for functional outcome 3 months after stroke by the modified Rankin Scale, and 254 participants in SAHLSIS had quantitative neuroimaging available.FindingsPlasma BD‐tau concentrations and cerebral infarct volumes were highly correlated (ρ 0.72, p < 0.001). BD‐tau improved the prognostic accuracy of suffering an unfavorable outcome over age and stroke severity in the whole cohort. However, the gain in predictive power was dependent on stroke severity and infarct location. The largest improvement was observed for mild ischemic strokes (NIHSS <5; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73 for age + NIHSS versus AUC = 0.84 with addition of BD‐tau; DeLong p 0.02), posterior circulation stroke (AUC = 0.75 vs. AUC = 0.84; DeLong p 0.06) and more specifically for infarcts in the brainstem/cerebellum (AUC = 0.74 vs. 0.87; DeLong p 0.009).ConclusionPlasma BD‐tau can provide information on the extent of acute neuronal damage in ischemic stroke and adds prognostic value for outcome, especially for mild and posterior circulation strokes.
Introduction The mantra “time is brain” cannot be overstated for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke. This is especially true for those with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) requiring transfer to an endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) capable center. We sought to evaluate the spoke hospital door in–door out (DIDO) times for patients transferred to our hub center for EVT. Methods Individuals who first presented with LVO to a spoke hospital and were then transferred to the hub for EVT were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database from January 2019 to November 2022. DIDO was defined as the time between spoke hospital door in arrival and door out exit. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared, dichotomizing DIDO at 90 minutes based in the American Heart Association goal for DIDO ≤90 minutes for 50% of transfers. Multivariable regression analyses were performed for determinants of the 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and DIDO. Results We identified 194 patients transferred for EVT with available DIDO. The median age was 67 years (IQR 57–80), and 46% were female. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 16 (10–20), 50% were treated with intravenous thrombolysis at a spoke, and TICI 2B-3 reperfusion was achieved in 87% at the hub. The median DIDO was 120 minutes (97–149), with DIDO ≤90 minutes achieved in 18%. DIDO was a significant determinant of 90-day ordinal mRS ( B = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.001–0.012, p = 0.013), even when accounting for the last known well-to-spoke door in, spoke door out-to-hub arrival, hub arrival-to-puncture, puncture-to-first pass, age, NIHSS, intravenous thrombolysis, TICI 2B-3, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Importantly, determinants of DIDO included Black race or Hispanic ethnicity ( B = 0.918, 95% CI = 0.010–1.826, p = 0.048), atrial fibrillation or heart failure ( B = 0.793, 95% CI = 0.257–1.329, p = 0.004), and basilar LVO location ( B = 2.528, 95% CI = 1.154–3.901, p < 0.001). Conclusion Spoke DIDO was the most important period of time for long-term outcomes of LVO stroke patients treated with EVT. Targets were identified to reduce DIDO and improve patient outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.