2017
DOI: 10.4155/tde-2017-0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Drug Delivery Via Periocular route: Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract: Drug delivery to the posterior segment via the periocular route is a promising route for delivery of a range of formulations. In this review, we have highlighted the challenges and opportunities of posterior segment drug delivery via the periocular route. Consequently, we have discussed different types of periocular routes, physiological barriers that limit effective drug delivery, practical challenges regarding patient compliance and acceptability and recent advances in developing innovative strategies to enh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Alternate local delivery methods, including intravitreal and periocular injections, can be effective for delivery to posterior ocular tissues. 8,9 Direct injection of drug into the vitreous humor through the pars-plana achieves high drug concentrations in the vitreous and the retina with fewer systemic side effects than systemic administration. 8 However, the benefit of intravitreal injections is often limited by a short drug half-life, thus requiring frequent injections, which may lead to complications such as retinal detachment, retinal hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, cataract formation, and secondary glaucoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1 Alternate local delivery methods, including intravitreal and periocular injections, can be effective for delivery to posterior ocular tissues. 8,9 Direct injection of drug into the vitreous humor through the pars-plana achieves high drug concentrations in the vitreous and the retina with fewer systemic side effects than systemic administration. 8 However, the benefit of intravitreal injections is often limited by a short drug half-life, thus requiring frequent injections, which may lead to complications such as retinal detachment, retinal hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, cataract formation, and secondary glaucoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Direct injection of drug into the vitreous humor through the pars-plana achieves high drug concentrations in the vitreous and the retina with fewer systemic side effects than systemic administration. 8 However, the benefit of intravitreal injections is often limited by a short drug half-life, thus requiring frequent injections, which may lead to complications such as retinal detachment, retinal hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, cataract formation, and secondary glaucoma. 3,8,9 Periocular (peribulbar, posterior juxtascleral, retrobulbar, sub-Tenon, and subconjunctival) injection can also deliver significant drug levels to the anterior and posterior segments, 8 is less invasive than intravitreal injections, and carries less risk of endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and increased ocular pressure than intravitreal injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All measurements for quality of life, such as disability‐adjusted life‐years, confirm that visual impairment is a highly ranked burden in all countries (Chiang et al, ). The leading causes of visual impairment and irreversible blindness are posterior segment‐related diseases (Pascolini and Mariotti, ), which include glaucoma, age‐related macular degeneration (AMD), macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis, posterior uveitis, diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) (Thrimawithana et al, ; del Amo et al, ; Waite et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%