Lumbar Fusion and Stabilization 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-68234-9_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Allograft and Plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A disadvantage of the use of iliac bone autograft alone in PLIF is graft collapse. This often results in nonunion or malunion, even though better fusion can be obtained if the pedicle screw fixation is added [9,10]. We believed that graft collapse would be prevented and bone union improved by combining the advantages of a cancellous bone autograft as a source of osteoprogenitor cells with a cortical bone allograft as a bioactive, biodegradable spacer which provided mechanical support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A disadvantage of the use of iliac bone autograft alone in PLIF is graft collapse. This often results in nonunion or malunion, even though better fusion can be obtained if the pedicle screw fixation is added [9,10]. We believed that graft collapse would be prevented and bone union improved by combining the advantages of a cancellous bone autograft as a source of osteoprogenitor cells with a cortical bone allograft as a bioactive, biodegradable spacer which provided mechanical support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonunion occurred in 32 of 200 (16%) patients who underwent PLIF for disc herniation using iliac bone autograft without internal fixation [10]. It was also reported that in PLIF using iliac bone autograft for disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, the graft collapsed in 38 of 371 (10%) patients without internal fixation, 4 of 44 (9.1%) with Roy-Camille's pedicle screw system, and 1 of 87 (1.1%) with Steffee's VSP system [9]. In our series of Japanese patients, both the pedicle screw system and the hook and rod system decreased the incidence of delayed union or nonunion, although the former system was more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation