Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting

Anceschi, Umberto; Gaffi, Marco; Molinari, C.; Anceschi, Claudio

doi:10.4293/108680813x13794522666365

Cited by 12 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, of the 22 studies defined eligible for the qualitative analysis, one was excluded because of a lack of standardised reporting of the continence recovery outcome (Fig. ), leaving 21 studies .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table shows the outcomes of urinary continence in the studies included in the meta‐analysis, at 3–7, 30,45–75 90, 180 days and 1 year after removal of urinary catheter in patients undergoing RP (ORP, LRP or RARP) with or without PR of the rhabdosphincter. Table summarises the different surgical techniques used in the studies comprised in the meta‐analyses.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table shows the percentage of PSM estimated by the studies included in the meta‐analysis. The overall meta‐analysis of data in the various studies showed a rate of PSM comparable in the group of patients undergoing PR and in the group of patients undergoing standard RP (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82–1.31; P = 0.804; Fig.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of all the trials included in the meta‐analysis, six papers also reported information about the rate of AUR episodes in the comparison groups . From the meta‐analysis of these studies there was no statistically significant evidence to suggest any certain increased risk of AUR secondary to the PR of the sphincter (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.63–2.95; P = 0.937; Fig.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta‐analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the influence of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction (PR) on early return of continence after radical prostatectomy (RP); an updated systematic review of the literature. A systematic review of the literature was performed in June 2015, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and searching Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases. We searched the terms posterior reconstruction prostatectomy, double layer anastomosis prostatectomy across the 'Title' and 'Abstract' fields of the records, with the following limits: humans, gender (male), and language (English). The authors reviewed the records to identify studies comparing cohorts of patients who underwent RP with or without restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. A meta-analysis of the risk ratios estimated using data from the selected studies was performed. In all, 21 studies were identified, including three randomised controlled trials. The overall analysis of comparative studies showed that PR improved early continence recovery at 3-7, 30, and 90 days after catheter removal, while the continence rate at 180 days was statistically but not clinically affected. Statistically significantly lower anastomotic leakage rates were described after PR. There were no significant differences for positive surgical margins rates or for complications such as acute urinary retention and bladder neck stricture. The analysis confirms the benefits at 30 days after catheter removal already discussed in the review published in 2012, but also shows a significant advantage in terms of urinary continence recovery in the first 90 days. A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial is currently being conducted in several institutions around the world to better assess the effectiveness of PR in facilitating an earlier recovery of postoperative urinary continence.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta‐analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Patient S/CMain outcomes S/CFrancesco Rocco 6 Italy1998–2003Historical Cohort StudyPR(RRP)0 padICIQ-SFN/A161/503 day: 72.0%/14.0% 1 mon: 78.8%/30.0% 3 mon: 86.3%/46.0%U. Anceschi 15 Italy2007–2012Historical Cohort StudyPR(LRP)0 padICQ-SF and SF-36N/A52/541 mo: 69%/37% 3 mons: 86%/54%Rafael Coelho 16 USAN/AHistorical Cohort StudyPR(RALP)0 padEPIC+473/3301 wk: 28.7%/22.7% 4 wks: 51.6%/42.7%Georgios Daouacher 17 Sweden2005–2011Historical Cohort StudyPR(LRP)0/0–1 padsstandard self-assessed questionnaireN/A99/991 mo: 33%/16% 3 mo: 66%/44% 6 mo: 81%/67%Keiichi Ito 18 Japan2008–2011Historical Cohort StudyPR(LRP)0 padUCLA-PCImostly −19/131 mo: 21%/7% 3 mo: 48%/13%Chang Wook Jeong 19 Korea2009–2011Historical Cohort StudyPR(RALP)Complete: 0 pad Social: 0–1 padsEPICmostly +113/116Complete: 2 wk: 30.1%/19.8% 1 mo: 58.4%/45.7% 3 mo: 82.7%/70.5%Isaac Yi Kim 20 USA2007Historical Cohort StudyPR(RALP)0 padEPICN/A25/251 wk: 24%/36% 3 mon: 84%/76%Mike Nguyen 21 USA2006Historical Cohort StudyPR(RALP/LRP)0–1 padsself-reported questionnaire+32/303 day: 34%/3% 6 wk: 56%/17%Francesco Rocco 22 Italy1998–2005Historical Cohort StudyPR(RRP)0–1 padsICIQ-SF+250/503 day: 62.4%/14.0% 1 mon: 74.0%/30.0% 3 mon: 85.2%/46.0%Takeshi Sano 23 Japan2007–2008Historical Cohort StudyPR(LRP)0 padN/A+25/23…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques

Cui

Guo

et al. 2017

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the gold standard for the treatment of localized PCa. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of different techniques of pelvic floor reconstruction on urinary continence. A comprehensive search was made for trials that evaluated the efficacy of pelvic floor reconstruction. Relevant databases included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, Web of Science databases and relevant trials from the references. Random-effects model was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) statistics. Pooled results of patients treated with posterior reconstruction (PR) demonstrated complete urinary continence improved at 1–4, 28–42, 90, 180 and 360 days following catheter removal. Anterior suspension (AS) was associated with improvement only at 28–42 days. The anterior reconstruction (AR) + PR was associated with urinary continence at 1–4, 90 and 180 days. AS + PR was not associated with any benefit. And PR improved social urinary continence at 7–14 and 28–42 days. No benefit was associated with AS. AR + PR had better outcomes at 90 and 180 days. AS + PR was significant improved at 28–42 and 90 days. Patients who underwent RP and PR had the least urinary incontinence. No significant benefit was observed after AS. AR + PR and AS + PR had little benefit in the post-operative period.

show abstract

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer

Rosenberg

Jung

Lee

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting

Abstract: Posterior reconstruction was found to be associated with lower degree of anastomotic leakage and enhanced urinary continence at one and three months after extrafascial laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Cited by 12 publications

References 22 publications

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta‐analysis

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta‐analysis

Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About