2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A review with emphasis on neuroimaging characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
1
12

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
116
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…All reviewed patients presented cortical and/or subcortical T2/FLAIR hyperintensities or hypodensities on CT when MRI was not performed, which was consistent with the main findings of PRES (3,4). These hyperintensities correspond to the brain edema caused by vascular dysregulation, leading to acute vasodilatation and classically vasogenic edema, with proven pathological/imaging correlation (56).…”
Section: Radiological Featuressupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All reviewed patients presented cortical and/or subcortical T2/FLAIR hyperintensities or hypodensities on CT when MRI was not performed, which was consistent with the main findings of PRES (3,4). These hyperintensities correspond to the brain edema caused by vascular dysregulation, leading to acute vasodilatation and classically vasogenic edema, with proven pathological/imaging correlation (56).…”
Section: Radiological Featuressupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although there is currently no unified diagnostic algorithm, neuroimaging usually yields bilateral corticalsubcortical vasogenic edema according to three anatomic patterns: dominant parieto-occipital involvement, variant atypical PRES, and combination of different patterns. Variant atypical PRES gathers superior frontal sulcus, holohemispheric watershed, cerebellum, basal ganglia, brainstem, and spinal cord involvements (3,4). The atypical or combined patterns are more common than the typical PRES with isolated parieto-occipital involvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the clinical features, neuroimaging, especially MRI, is essential in the evaluation and diagnosis of PRES with atypical regions (28). The lesion locations are very important in terms of the MRI features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vasogenic theory proposes that sudden, severe hypertension (i.e., exceeding the capacity of cerebral blood flow autoregulation) leads to endothelial injury, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and subsequent vasogenic edema [2,10]. On the other hand, vasospasm and resultant cerebral ischemia may develop neurological symptoms [6,11]. The cytotoxic theory proposes that the endothelial dysfunction of PRES is due to exogenic toxins, such as drugs for chemotherapy or immunosuppression, or endogenic toxins, such as those generated during sepsis or eclampsia [2,6,12,13].…”
Section: Pathophysiological Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, vasospasm and resultant cerebral ischemia may develop neurological symptoms [6,11]. The cytotoxic theory proposes that the endothelial dysfunction of PRES is due to exogenic toxins, such as drugs for chemotherapy or immunosuppression, or endogenic toxins, such as those generated during sepsis or eclampsia [2,6,12,13]. The immunogenic theory proposes that endotheliopathy, mediated by T-cell activation and the release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) and interleukin-1 (IL-1), increases endothelial permeability and subsequent vasogenic edema [3,4,10,14].…”
Section: Pathophysiological Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%