2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.03812
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior samples of source galaxies in strong gravitational lenses with score-based priors

Abstract: Inferring accurate posteriors for high-dimensional representations of the brightness of gravitationally-lensed sources is a major challenge, in part due to the difficulties of accurately quantifying the priors. Here, we report the use of a score-based model to encode the prior for the inference of undistorted images of background galaxies. This model is trained on a set of high-resolution images of undistorted galaxies. By adding the likelihood score to the prior score and using a reverse-time stochastic diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility for circumventing this issue is to have a separate approximate inference of the nuisance parameters and draw the simulations for the density estimation stage from these posteriors. This may be possible in a scenario where a separate network is trained to infer a posterior distribution for the nuisance parameters (e.g., a generative model for the background source conditioned on the data; see Adam et al 2022aAdam et al , 2022b. As mentioned earlier, alternative implicit likelihood inference frameworks that allow implicit marginalization over nuisance parameters (e.g., likelihood ratio methods) are generally only practical in low-dimensional spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility for circumventing this issue is to have a separate approximate inference of the nuisance parameters and draw the simulations for the density estimation stage from these posteriors. This may be possible in a scenario where a separate network is trained to infer a posterior distribution for the nuisance parameters (e.g., a generative model for the background source conditioned on the data; see Adam et al 2022aAdam et al , 2022b. As mentioned earlier, alternative implicit likelihood inference frameworks that allow implicit marginalization over nuisance parameters (e.g., likelihood ratio methods) are generally only practical in low-dimensional spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most important limitation of the method is the fact that, in its current form, the model only provides point estimates of the parameters of interest. Quantifying the posteriors of such high-dimensional data will require an efficient and accurate generative process (e.g., see Adam et al 2022), which we plan to explore and develop in future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, analyzing such unprecedentedly large samples will also pose a computational challenge. One way to tackle this challenge is to use machine learning for lensing parameter extraction from the data, which is currently an active area of research (e.g., Hezaveh et al 2017;Morningstar et al 2019;Schuldt et al 2021;Adam et al 2022;Poh et al 2022;Mishra-Sharma and Yang 2022;Biggio et al 2023). However, depending on specific scientific requirements, the conventional forward modeling approach would still be favorable for a subset of all the new lenses.…”
Section: Future Prospects In the Era Of Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%