IntroductionThe use of mobile bearing implant systems such as the LCS (low contact stress) knee (DePuy AG, Cham, Switzerland) for total knee replacements has proven to be very successful with an excellent long-term survivorship history [3]. After the introduction of the A/P-Glide tibial component, a posterior cruciate retaining design, an increase of complaints about persisting anterior knee pain was observed postoperatively, which led to further investigations. In this work we present the early follow-up results for 230 knees. To illustrate the soft-tissue irritation, five cases were studied with a PET 18F-FDG scan in a pilot project prior to revision surgery.The aim of this publication is to communicate the higherthan-usual revision rate, to demonstrate the intraoperative findings of fat-pad impingement and to describe the typical symptoms.
Methods
SubjectsDuring a four-year period, 230 knee replacements with the LCS A/P-Glide bearing were performed in 218 subjects. The subjects were followed prospectively. Standard follow-up consultations were performed 3, 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Additional consultations were needed in the symptomatic cases. The clinical and radiological data was fed into a database using IDES software. The rate of revision surgery was documented. The decision to undertake revision surgery was made according to the severity of symptoms and the clinical findings. The reason for revision was documented on the clinical chart and the surgery protocol.Abstract Early follow-up (15.8 months;1-48) of 230 knee replacements with an LCS A/P Glide component indicated an increased occurrence of anterior knee pain due to a fat-pad impingement, necessitating early revision surgery. Unsatisfactory results were observed in 28 knees (12.2%). Thirteen knees (5.7%) were revised on finding the fat-pad impingement, and four knees (1.7%) were scheduled for later revision surgery; the remaining 11 subjects (4.8%) had revision surgery for a different reason. Twenty-six subjects (11.3%) complained about milder but typical symptoms of a fat-pad impingement, and 22 subjects (9.6%) had unspecific mild symptoms. 151 knees (65.7%) were free of pain and demonstrated an excellent result. The total revision rate of 10.4% (24 knees) is higher than described for other implant systems. However, the revision needed to treat the fat-pad impingement (5.7%) consisted of minor surgery only, such as exchange of the mobile bearing or reduction of the fat pad by arthroscopy. The femoral and tibial components were able to be left untouched. Resection of the Hoffa's fat pad is recommended when such an implant system is used, and possible impingement should be investigated intraoperatively before closure.