“…Surgical indications for them were more than grade II PCL injuries with or without more than grade II PLC injuries. 16,58 The inclusion criteria were (1) a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, (2) 8-mm increased posterior tibial translation compared with that of the uninvolved knee on posterior stress radiography, 17,21 (3) a difference of .10°between knees on the dial test at 30°and 90°w ith a 5-mm increase in the varus gap compared with the uninvolved knee on varus stress radiography in cases of combined PLRI, 34,39,58 (4) transtibial PCL reconstruction with remnant preservation using a transposterior septal portal, and (5) PLC reconstruction using the single fibular sling method in cases of combined PLRI. We excluded patients with (1) bilateral injuries, (2) multiple ligament injuries except for a combined PCL and PLC injury, (3) use of other PCL or PLC reconstruction techniques, (4) combined lower extremity fractures, (5) infections, (6) revision surgery, (7) more than grade 3 cartilage lesions as assessed by the Outerbridge classification system, (8) varus or valgus malalignment in a lower extremity, and (9) prior surgery on the involved knee.…”