1966
DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450031101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posteruptive Changes in Dental Enamel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
38
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the arrestment of enamel lesions, the tooth surface becomes gradually smooth, shiny and shows a reduction in opacity. [19][20][21] However, the present study did not show any change in surface texture and brightness after lesion consolidation, probably due to the fact that all specimens were previously polished in order to allow microhardness assay. Additionally, the relatively small depth reached by in vitro lesions 10,18 may have contributed to the lack of roughness changes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…During the arrestment of enamel lesions, the tooth surface becomes gradually smooth, shiny and shows a reduction in opacity. [19][20][21] However, the present study did not show any change in surface texture and brightness after lesion consolidation, probably due to the fact that all specimens were previously polished in order to allow microhardness assay. Additionally, the relatively small depth reached by in vitro lesions 10,18 may have contributed to the lack of roughness changes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The relationship between the eruption stage and dental caries has been studied in longitudinal trials. Dirks [1966], who studied buccal surfaces of first permanent molars, observed the arrestment and/or regression of the lesions as a result of changes in the oral environment during tooth eruption. Similar findings were observed on occlusal surfaces [Carvalho et al, 1991[Carvalho et al, , 1992Maltz et al, 2003].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the arrestment of the carious process, it is not advocated that the infected dentine should be removed and a filling be placed 5, 10,12 . The mechanism that causes the arrest of deep caries lesions does not seem to differ from that observed in non-cavitated surfaces during tooth eruption [13][14] or after mechanical removal of biofilm from non-cavitated teeth 15 . The present study suggests that it is not necessary to reopen the cavity to remove the demineralized dentine as the demineralized dentine, once sealed, can turn from active to inactive and harbors fewer microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%