2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postfire soil burn severity mapping with hyperspectral image unmixing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater uncertainty in the low-and moderate-severity classes (relative to high-severity) results from fire effects on surface vegetation and substrate being obscured by live canopy cover (Miller and Thode, 2007;Meigs et al, 2009Meigs et al, , 2011Miller et al, 2009a), and this uncertainty may contribute to difficulty resolving differences in C stocks and losses among severity classes. Landsat-based indices of fire effects correlate well with forest overstory characteristics, and can show relatively good relationships with understory vegetation and soil severity when canopy severity is also high; however, the correlations with surface severity weaken when there is high post-fire live vegetation cover Robichaud et al, 2007).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Contrasting Fire Severity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greater uncertainty in the low-and moderate-severity classes (relative to high-severity) results from fire effects on surface vegetation and substrate being obscured by live canopy cover (Miller and Thode, 2007;Meigs et al, 2009Meigs et al, , 2011Miller et al, 2009a), and this uncertainty may contribute to difficulty resolving differences in C stocks and losses among severity classes. Landsat-based indices of fire effects correlate well with forest overstory characteristics, and can show relatively good relationships with understory vegetation and soil severity when canopy severity is also high; however, the correlations with surface severity weaken when there is high post-fire live vegetation cover Robichaud et al, 2007).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Contrasting Fire Severity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Efforts to develop and apply standard indices for characterizing fire severity are relatively recent and include remote sensing approaches Miller and Thode, 2007;Robichaud et al, 2007) as well as field classification of composite [e.g., Composite Burn Index (CBI), ] and stratrum-specific impacts (NPS, 2003;Keeley, 2009;Jain et al, 2012). Field indices classify fire severity based on the extent of organic matter loss or decomposition (i.e., using metrics such as tree crown scorch, tree mortality, woody fuel consumption, loss of soil organic horizons, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dNBR can be considered a consistent method for burn severity assessment, due to its proven relationship with field severity metrics. Empirical models have shown strong relationships (r 2 > 0.6-0.7) between dNBR and specific parameters of burn severity, such as ash cover percentage, tree mortality, or twig diameter [30,[34][35][36][37], or field indices, such as the Composite Burn Index (CBI) [31,[38][39][40][41][42]. Moreover, the bi-temporal approach, where values of the post-fire image are subtracted from values of the pre-fire image, is considered the best approach to detect change caused by fire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of these simulation models is that their performance is site-independent which greatly enhances their applicability and inter-comparability over a wide range of ecosystems [18,20]. Spectral mixture analysis (SMA) applied to post-fire images have resulted in fractional ground cover measures closely related to burning efficiency, usually implementing at least the green vegetation and charred soil endmembers [21][22][23]. SMA proved to be efficient in detecting the charcoal signal even in lightly burned areas that kept a strong vegetation signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%