Postmarketing Surveillance of New Food Ingredients: Results from the Program with the Fat Replacer Olestra

Allgood, Gregory S.; Kuter, David J.; Roll, Kevin T.; Taylor, Stephen L; Zorich, Nora L.

doi:10.1006/rtph.2001.1460

Cited by 17 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[25][26][27] The first attempt at such monitoring (for phytosterol enriched foods) found that people who buy the product eat less than was anticipated and that no serious adverse effects have been reported to manufacturers' consumer care lines. 19 27 Data were gathered at the household level only, however, so users were not characterised and it was not possible specifically to estimate exposure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional foods: the case for closer evaluation

Jong

Klungel

Verhagen

et al. 2007

BMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional foods: the case for closer evaluation

Jong

Klungel

Verhagen

et al. 2007

BMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…PMM is currently not an obligatory requirement for all new foods, but in the past legislative authorities have requested PMM programs as part of the approval of certain new food ingredients (Van Puijenbroek et al, 2007). For example, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) demanded a post-market monitoring program after the introduction of Aspartame (artificial sweetener) and the fat substitute Olestra (Allgood et al, 2001). The European Commission called for PMM after the introduction of a cholesterol lowering vegetable oil spread (Amanor-Boadu, 2004).…”

Section: Developing Satiety Enhancing Food Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Successful Development of Satiety Enhancing Food Products: Towards a Multidisciplinary Agenda of Research Challenges

Kleef

Trijp

Borne

et al. 2012

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the context of increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in societies worldwide, enhancing the satiating capacity of foods may help people control their energy intake and weight. This requires an integrated approach between various food-related disciplines. By structuring this approach around the new product development process, this paper aims to present the contours of such an integrative approach by going through the current state of the art around satiety enhancing foods. It portrays actual food choice as the end result of a complex interaction between internal satiety signals, other food benefits, and environmental cues. Three interrelated routes to satiating enhancement are to change the food composition to develop stronger physiological satiation and satiety signals, anticipate and build on smart external stimuli at the moment of purchase and consumption, and improve palatability and acceptance of satiety enhanced foods. Key research challenges in achieving these routes in the field of nutrition, food technology, consumer, marketing, and communication are outlined.

show abstract

“…A number of studies have proposed methods for the Post-Market Monitoring of novel foods (Butchko et all 1994, Allgood et al 2001, Simojoki et al 2005, Welch et al 2011and Willems et al 2013. Below the methodologies have been split by those for intake assessments and those for causality assessment of adverse events for reporting.…”

Section: Monitoring Of Novel Foodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This could include information on: patient demographics, levels of consumption, the severity and duration of the reaction and if medical assistance e.g. a hospital visit was required (Hepburn et al 2006, Allgood et al 2001and Wal et al 2003. Once the information on the adverse event had been gathered, the data could be sent for internal and external review, by trained medical professionals e.g.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategy support for the Post‐Market Monitoring (PMM) of GM plants: Review of existing PMM strategies developed for the safety assessment of human and animal health

ltd¹

2015

EFSA Supporting Publications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified (GM) food and feed legalised the requirement for a Post-Market Monitoring (PMM) plan if the outcome of the risk assessment identifies a need to do so. This report provided a systematic review of existing monitoring programmes for food, feed, human and animal health and an inventory of data collection sources that may be useful for PMM of GM food and feed. Under the legislative requirements PMM should confirm that specific recommendations of use are followed by the consumer/animal owner, qualify the predicted consumption of GM food and feed and further characterise any intended or unintended effects highlighted during the pre-market risk assessment. The largest barriers to conducting PMM of GM food and feed in the EU were found to be the 'unrecognisable' nature of GM traits further down the food and feed supply chain after processing, and the lack of appropriate consumption data at the branded/product level. EU legislation on traceability and labelling of GMOs requires products to carry a 'unique identifier', however, this information is lost once the product is further processed to become a product 'produced from a GMO'. Consumption data held at a product level by retailers or market research agencies was shown to be more useful for PMM of GM food or feed than that held at the national level by public bodies. The project concludes that several changes would be required in order to conduct comprehensive PMM of GM food and feed in the EU, namely; greater detail on traceability requirements of GMOs, a database of which food and feed products contain which GM traits at specific quantities, consumption data at the branded/product level and a system for reporting the relevance and intensity of effects and unintended effects.

show abstract

Postmarketing Surveillance of New Food Ingredients: Results from the Program with the Fat Replacer Olestra

Cited by 17 publications

References 25 publications

Functional foods: the case for closer evaluation

Functional foods: the case for closer evaluation

Successful Development of Satiety Enhancing Food Products: Towards a Multidisciplinary Agenda of Research Challenges

Strategy support for the Post‐Market Monitoring (PMM) of GM plants: Review of existing PMM strategies developed for the safety assessment of human and animal health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About