The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118247273.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postmodernism and Intercultural Discourse: World Englishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second section describes the methodology of the study and presents a Critical Approach to Discourse and Intercultural Communication (KUBOTA, 2012;CANAGARAJAH, 2012) -a methodologically complementing perspective through which to examine the data, the participants, the context of the study, the instruments for data collection and analysis, and the procedures for analyzing the data. The third section presents the results of this analysis.…”
Section: ) How Do Teletandem Practitioners Perform Their National Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second section describes the methodology of the study and presents a Critical Approach to Discourse and Intercultural Communication (KUBOTA, 2012;CANAGARAJAH, 2012) -a methodologically complementing perspective through which to examine the data, the participants, the context of the study, the instruments for data collection and analysis, and the procedures for analyzing the data. The third section presents the results of this analysis.…”
Section: ) How Do Teletandem Practitioners Perform Their National Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To broaden students' worldviews and to promote deeper and critical understandings and appreciation of the differences, the essentialisms of these online conversations can first be accessed through critical approaches to intercultural discourse and communication (KUBOTA, 2012;CANAGARAJAH, 2012). Thus, these essentialisms must be deconstructed and the matrix of their organization revealed for critical scrutiny.…”
Section: Teletandemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these similarities and variations should not be recognized as a deviation from standard English but as pluralizing academic writing (Canagarajah, 2006). Pluralizing English refers to norms and standards of particular and localized varieties of English that have uniquely emerged in national or social contexts (Canagarajah, 2006;House, 2012;Y. Kachru, 1995;Matsuda & Matsuda, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study hopes to contribute to the ELFA paradigm methodologically by using MDA as a model to compare various linguistic features in specialized corpora to enrich the literature with new cross-cultural and linguistic information. Therefore, these similarities and variations should not be recognized as a deviation from standard English but as pluralizing academic writing (Canagarajah, 2006). Pluralizing English refers to norms and standards of particular and localized varieties of English that have uniquely emerged in national or social contexts (Canagarajah, 2006;House, 2012;Y.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the former viewpoint, even when Anglo-American values or concepts are not regarded as a threat in EFL contexts, they may simply be seen as irrelevant or confusing (McKay, 2003). More recently, research has been questioning the possibility of a core variety of English shared by all communities giving way to the view of English as a heterogeneous language with, among other things, plural cultural norms, accommodating the expression of diverse local values and identities (see Canagarajah, 2012 on how the language-culture connection has been debated in the field of English studies). That said, instead of defining English as a culturefree language, lingua franca communication is seen as negotiating differences through effective (culture-specific) pragmatic strategies that facilitate the use of local varieties each interlocutor brings to the communication and enable speakers to maintain their own varieties and values (Canagarajah, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%