2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0952836902000377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postnatal growth in body length and mass of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard

Abstract: The von Bertalanffy curve was used to examine growth patterns in both body length and mass of female and male polar bears Ursus maritimus live-captured near Svalbard, Norway. A longer growth period in males resulted in pronounced sexual dimorphism in both body length and mass. Males were 1.16 times longer and 2.10 times heavier than females. The asymptotic body length of female and male polar bears from Svalbard was smaller than that for polar bears in four of six previously studied populations. Asymptotic bod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is possible to estimate body masses for extant animals with reasonable precision since detailed information is often available in the literature relating body mass to specific linear body dimensions. We measured appropriate dimensions (shoulder height for most species but femur length for Cervus elaphus and body length for Ursus maritimus) directly from the point clouds and calculated the predicted body mass based on literature derived scaling equations [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In most cases, there was good information available but the values for Dicerorhinus sumatrensis, Megaloceros giganteus and Tapirus indicus are somewhat less reliable since no systematic assessment of body mass and dimensions could be found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to estimate body masses for extant animals with reasonable precision since detailed information is often available in the literature relating body mass to specific linear body dimensions. We measured appropriate dimensions (shoulder height for most species but femur length for Cervus elaphus and body length for Ursus maritimus) directly from the point clouds and calculated the predicted body mass based on literature derived scaling equations [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In most cases, there was good information available but the values for Dicerorhinus sumatrensis, Megaloceros giganteus and Tapirus indicus are somewhat less reliable since no systematic assessment of body mass and dimensions could be found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard body measurements (standard length and axillary girth) were taken and total body mass was estimated using the approach by Derocher & Wiig [26]. Field estimates of age and reproductive status were recorded.…”
Section: (B) Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one female could not be weighed, we estimated its body mass using morphometric measurements (i.e., axillary girth and dorsal straight-line body length) following Derocher and Wiig (2002). For all females, dorsal straight-line body length (SL) measures the straight line above the bear (lying in sternal recumbency) from the tip of the nose to the tip of the last tail vertebra.…”
Section: Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%