Postoperative Care and Follow-Up After Coronary Stenting

Rassaf, Tienush; Steiner, Stephan; Kelm, Malte

doi:10.3238/arztebl.2013.0072

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Three and six months after hospital discharge a telephone follow up took place so as to assess patients' adherence to dietary advice. The main reason for choosing the 3 and 6 months time after hospital discharge was the fact that, according to literature, patients undergone stent implemention should be followed regularly (every three to six months) as this a high risk period for patients with acute coronary syndrome [15].…”

Section: Follow-upmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Benefits of Patients’ Information regarding Dietary Habits before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 3- and 6-Month Follow-Up

Argyriou¹,

Vasilopoulos²,

Georgia³

et al. 2018

WJCD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate the benefits of counseling intervention related to dietary habits changes on patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and Methods: A randomized counseling intervention study, with a 3-and 6-month follow-up was performed on 230 patients who underwent PCI. They were randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 93) or the control group (n = 137). A 3-and 6-month telephone follow-up was performed for dietary habits evaluation. Data analysis was performed by using the statistical package SPSS, ver. 20. Results: Compared with control group, intervention group had higher prevalence of hypertension, history of diabetes and dyslipidemias and history of acute myocardial infraction, with no statistical difference. Moreover, patients in control group were more likely to be ex-smokers (p = 0.01). Post hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that mean TCHOL concentration while patients admitted to hospital differed statistically significantly between the time points of 3 and 6 months (209 ± 67 mg/dl vs 174 ± 34 mg/dl vs 176 ± 36 mg/dl), p = 0.005 and p = 0.042 respectively. However, there was no statistical significant difference between 3 months and 6 months measurements. Mean glucose concentration while patients admitted to hospital differed statistically significantly between the time points of 3 and 6 months (108 ± 40 mg/dl vs 95 ± 21 mg/dl vs 95 ± 23 mg/dl), p = 0.

show abstract

Section: Follow-upmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Benefits of Patients’ Information regarding Dietary Habits before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 3- and 6-Month Follow-Up

Argyriou¹,

Vasilopoulos²,

Georgia³

et al. 2018

WJCD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Während bei Patienten mit stabiler KHK additiv zu ASS die Gabe von Clopidogrel Standard ist, werden bei Patienten mit ACS unter Berücksichtigung der Nebenwirkungen und Kontraindikationen die neueren P2Y 12 -Blocker Prasugrel und Ticagrelor empfohlen. Die aktuellen Leitlinien [14,15,19] empfehlen bei Patienten mit stabiler KHK nach Implantation von nicht-Medikamenten-freisetzenden Stents die duale Hemmung der Thrombozytenaggregation für mindestens 4 Wochen und für Medikamentenfreisetzende Stents -bei stabiler KHK und beim ACS -für 12 Monate beizubehalten. Diese Empfehlung beruht auf Beobachtungsstudien, die ein erhöhtes Risiko für Stentthrombosen bei vorzeitiger Beendigung der dualen Therapie beschreiben.…”

Section: Nachsorge Nach Revaskularisation ▼ Hemmung Der Thrombozytenaunclassified

“…Nach Implantation eines Stents muss bei akuten Beschwerden immer an eine Stentthrombose gedacht werden [15] Tab. 1 Algorithmus zur Anwendung verschiedener Techniken der Bypassoperation in Abhängigkeit vom Zustand des Patienten [1].…”

Section: Stentthromboseunclassified

Koronare Herzerkrankung: Neues zu Stents und Bypässen

Rassaf

Albert

2013

Dtsch med Wochenschr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The indication for a stress test should be determined by a cardiologist . The main rationale for stress testing in asymptomatic patients after PCI may reside in the search for silent ischemia caused by restenosis or disease progression.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A multidisciplinary consensus document on follow‐up strategies for patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Rossini

Visconti

Musumeci

et al. 2014

Cathet Cardio Intervent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is increasing worldwide. Follow-up strategies after PCI are extremely heterogeneous and can greatly affect the cost of medical care. Of note, clinical evaluations and non-invasive exams are often performed to low risk patients. In the present consensus document, practical advises are provided with respect to a tailored follow-up strategy on the basis of patients' risk profile. Three strategies follow-up have been defined and types and timing of clinical and instrumental evaluations are reported. Clinical and interventional cardiologists, cardiac rehabilitators, and general practitioners, who are in charge to manage post-PCI patients, equally contributed to the creation of the present document.

show abstract

Postoperative Care and Follow-Up After Coronary Stenting

Abstract: Repeated history taking and physical examination play an important role after PCI. For patients at high risk of restenosis and those with complex coronary morphology, coronary angiography may be indicated regardless of the findings of non-invasive stress tests.

Cited by 16 publications

References 48 publications

The Benefits of Patients’ Information regarding Dietary Habits before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 3- and 6-Month Follow-Up

The Benefits of Patients’ Information regarding Dietary Habits before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 3- and 6-Month Follow-Up

Koronare Herzerkrankung: Neues zu Stents und Bypässen

A multidisciplinary consensus document on follow‐up strategies for patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About