2011
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e31820cf233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative Complications in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix

Abstract: Patient selection for prosthesis reconstruction involving acellular dermal matrix should be judicious, especially among smokers and patients with elevated body mass index. Even though the use of acellular dermal matrix allows higher initial volumes and reduced number of expansions, one should be careful about putting in too high of an initial volume.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
124
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
124
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several features of implants, such as texture or polyurethane coating [15], do not seem to be able to modify the infection rate. Instead, implant coating with acellular dermal matrix increases the risk of infection, as confirmed by Liu et al [16] in a case report of 470 patients that noted, after immediate reconstruction, a 4.2% rate of implant removal due to infection for implants coated with acellular dermal matrix, compared to 2.4% for non-coated implants. With regard to contamination of saline implants, although the shell is not permeable to bacteria [17], bacteria can enter into the lumen through the implant valve [18].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Several features of implants, such as texture or polyurethane coating [15], do not seem to be able to modify the infection rate. Instead, implant coating with acellular dermal matrix increases the risk of infection, as confirmed by Liu et al [16] in a case report of 470 patients that noted, after immediate reconstruction, a 4.2% rate of implant removal due to infection for implants coated with acellular dermal matrix, compared to 2.4% for non-coated implants. With regard to contamination of saline implants, although the shell is not permeable to bacteria [17], bacteria can enter into the lumen through the implant valve [18].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, several studies have also shown increased rates of seroma formation in patients who have undergone AlloDerm-associated (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, NJ) reconstructions [16,17,22,23], with an incidence ranging from 0 to 9 % in one particular systematic review [1]. Poor contact between the ADM and overlying tissues secondary to irregularity at the soft tissue interface and intentional under inflation of the tissue expander have been cited as reasons for these increased seroma rates [8,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continued tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis has been associated with various detrimental clinical outcomes such as shorter survival (Videtic et al, 2003;Fox et al, 2004;Sardari Nia et al, 2005;Zhou et al, 2006;Nguyenet al, 2010;Parsonset al, 2010;Kenfield, et al, 2011); increased risk of tumor recurrence or development of secondary malignancies (Do et al, 2003;Kawaguchi et al, 2006;Garces et al, 2007;Kaufman et al, 2008;Li et al, 2009;Joshu et al, 2011); poorer response to treatment and an increased risk of treatment toxicities (Monson et al, 1998;Dresler, 2003;O'Sullivan et al, 2003;van der Bol et al, 2007;de Jong et al, 2008;Waller et al, 2011;Petros et al, 2012); an increased risk of surgical complications (Moller et al, 2002;Barrera et al, 2005;Selber et al, 2006;Liu et al, 2011); and inferior bone marrow transplantation outcomes (Marks et al, 2009;Ehlers et al, 2011 ;Tran et al, 2011). Conversely, smoking cessation post-cancer diagnosis has been associated with better pain control and an improved quality of life (Garces et al, 2004;Baser et al, 2006;Daniel et al, 2009;Ditre et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%