E ver since Bedford's seminal 1955 case series in the Lancet titled "Adverse Cerebral Effects of Anesthesia on Old People," we have known that some patients have cognitive problems after anesthesia and surgery. 1 Today, the term postoperative delirium is often used to describe the mental state of many of these patients. Delirium is a syndrome of waxing and waning mental status changes and alterations in the level of consciousness. It is a common (and likely underrecognized) complication correlated with adverse outcomes including decreased quality of life and increased hospital and 6-month mortality. 2 More recently, postoperative delirium has also been associated with cognitive decline during the first year after cardiac surgery. 3 Is there anything that we as anesthesiologists can do to decrease the incidence of delirium? Processed electroencephalography (EEG) (e.g., Bispectral Index, BIS) is a controversial tool in anesthesiology but may be a useful instrument for preventing postoperative delirium. In this issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, Whitlock et al. 4 examine whether using a BIS monitor decreases the incidence of delirium in cardiothoracic surgery patients. They report a trend toward less delirium in the BIS-guided anesthetic group versus the end-tidal anesthetic concentration (ETAC)-guided group (18.8% vs 28%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.058) despite adequate statistical power. Nevertheless, this finding is consistent with the results of similar studies in noncardiac surgical patients, which have shown that BIS-guided anesthetic titration (as opposed to typical titration to hemodynamic end points) lowers the incidence of delirium. 5,6 Even when spinal anesthesia was the primary anesthetic technique, titrating sedation depth to a BIS ≥80 vs approximately 50 decreased the incidence of delirium. 7 In each of these studies, BIS usage (or a higher BIS target range) was associated with lower average anesthetic dosage 6,7 or a decreased incidence of deep anesthesia (e.g., BIS values <20). 5 Although Whitlock et al. 4 also found a trend toward lower delirium incidence in patients enrolled in the BIS arm, neither the average ETAC, nor cumulative anesthetic exposure (e.g., MAC-hours), 8 nor the occurrence of deep anesthesia (BIS <20) is given for the BIS versus ETAC titration arms. Thus, it is unclear whether the trend toward less delirium in the BIS group was also associated with less anesthetic delivery. The authors did compare delirious and nondelirious patients and found no differences in the time spent under deep anesthesia in these 2 groups (as measured by duration of BIS <45, proportion of time with a BIS <20, or the percentage of patients in each group whose BIS was ever <20). In a multivariable analysis employing elegant statistical methodology, comorbidity scores, transfusion, and average ETAC were associated with delirium, but BIS usage (i.e., BIS group) was not. 4 If that is the case, can we really posit that BIS offers more value than ETAC for preventing delirium?...