2008
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00

Abstract: Both regimens as used in the present study are well tolerated and safe. The rates of severe taxane-related toxic effects and thrombocytopenia, although low overall, are significantly increased with the dose-dense sequential regimen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DI of the essential drugs, epirubicin and paclitaxel, was double in the sequential dose-dense arm. Safety analysis results have been previously reported [10]. In this report, we present the efficacy results of this trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, DI of the essential drugs, epirubicin and paclitaxel, was double in the sequential dose-dense arm. Safety analysis results have been previously reported [10]. In this report, we present the efficacy results of this trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Group A: epirubicin (E) 110 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by 3 cycles of paclitaxel (T, 250 mg/m 2 ) every 2 weeks, followed by 3 cycles of CMF (cyclophosphamide 840 mg/m 2 , methotrexate 57 mg/m 2 and 5-fluorouracil 840 mg/m 2 ) every 2 weeks (E-T-CMF) [12]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group has employed dose-dense sequential regimens biweekly with G-CSF support from day 2 to day 10 of each chemotherapy cycle. Those regimens proved to be efficacious and safe, provided that G-CSF was also administered as primary prophylaxis [12, 13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients (n = 7,025) that were part of the HE 10/97 [33], HE 10/00 [34], HE 10/04 [35,36], HE 10/05 (unpublished), HE 10/08 (unpublished), HE 11/02 [37], HE 11/06 [38], and HE 11/07 [39] prospective clinical trial populationscoordinated and conducted by HeCOG-were checked for ER, PR, and HER2 status based on initial histology report; paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of all patients enrolled before 2004 or with metastatic disease were additionally assessed by central pathology review (n = 2,566). Trial eligibility criteria did not include any selection based on age of onset or family history.…”
Section: Patient Study Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%