Postoperative infection and mortality following elective surgery in the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS)

Abstract

Background Postoperative infection is one of the most frequent and important complications after surgery. The epidemiology of infection following elective surgery remains poorly described. Methods This was a prospective analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS) describing infection by 30 days after elective surgery. Associations between postoperative infection (primary outcome) and baseline demographic, surgical, and anaesthetic risk factors were assessed. Analyses were carried out using logistic and linear regression models. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and duration of hospital stay. Treatments received by patients after different types of infection were evaluated. Results Some 44 814 patients were included in the analysis, with a total of 4032 infections occurring in 2927 patients (6.5 per cent). Overall, 206 patients died, of whom 99 of 2927 (3.4 per cent) had infection. Some 737 of 4032 infections (18.3 per cent) were severe; the most frequent types were superficial surgical-site infection (1320, 32.7 per cent), pneumonia (708, 17.6 per cent), and urinary tract infection (681, 16.9 per cent). Excluding missing data, antimicrobials were used in 2126 of 2749 infections (77.3 per cent), and 522 of 2164 patients (24.1 per cent) required admission to critical care. Factors associated with an increased incidence of infection in adjusted analyses were: age, male sex, ASA grade, co-morbid disease, preoperative anaemia, anaesthetic technique, surgical category, surgical severity, and cancer surgery. Infection significantly increased the risk of death (odds ratio 4.68, 95 per cent c.i. 3.39 to 6.47; P < 0.001), and duration of hospital stay by on average 6.45 (6.23 to 6.66) days (P < 0.001). Conclusion Infection is a common complication after elective surgery. Recognition of modifiable risk factors will help inform appropriate prevention strategies.

Liberal or restrictive antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical site infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

“…38 The overall rate of surgical site infection in the reported trials is comparable to the incidence of 5e10% reported in recent international epidemiological studies. 4,7,39,26 In a meta-regression including the year of the study, we found minimal change in the rate of surgical site infection, or influence of liberal antimicrobial prophylaxis. Whereas the effectiveness of infection control measures have improved over time, patient risk factors (e.g.…”

Infección Nosocomial: situación en España

“…Los factores asociados a una mayor incidencia de infección en los análisis ajustados fueron: edad, sexo masculino, grado ASA, enfermedad comórbida, anemia preoperatoria, técnica anestésica, categoría quirúrgica, gravedad quirúrgica y cirugía oncológica. La infección aumentó significativamente el riesgo de muerte (odds ratio 4,68; Intervalo de Confianza del 95%: 3,39 a 6,47; p < 0,001) y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria en una media de 6,45 días [29]…”

Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative setting

“…As the life expectancy of the population increases, a higher number of surgical interventions are now performed in patients with more comorbidities and more complex procedures will be done [2]. In the last 15 years, cohort studies in different countries and regions have confirmed that the overall surgical mortality is about 4%, and the high-risk population comprises 20% of the surgical patients but contributes to higher rates of complications and mortality and to 80% of costs [3][4][5].…”