Postoperative recovery; Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy versus Conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Khan, Aiman; Mahar, Tania; Adnan, Muhammad Kashif; Surahio, Abdul Rasheed; Manan, Abdul; Ahmad, Irfan

doi:10.29309/tpmj/2019.27.01.4098

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite these treatments, hemorrhoidectomy remains a common surgical option. However, a newer, minimally invasive alternative is the Minimally Invasive Procedure for Hemorrhoids (MIPH), or stapled hemorrhoidopexy (13,14). This study aims to compare the short-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy and traditional open hemorrhoidectomy, exploring the effectiveness and recovery implications of these two surgical approaches (15).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stapled Hemorhoidopexy vs. Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Comparative Study of Short-Term Results

Shaukat,

Mustajab,

Sahar

et al. 2023

JHRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of the short-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy. The objective was to assess factors such as age distribution, length of hospital stay, postoperative discomfort, and time taken to return to regular work, to understand the relative merits of these surgical methods in treating hemorrhoids. Methods: This retrospective comparative study reviewed stapled hemorrhoidopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy cases conducted at the surgical OPD/Ward of Mardan Medical Complex from January 2023 to August 2023. Patients who underwent either procedure and were in the age groups of 15–25, 26–35, or 36–60 years met the inclusion criteria. The study analyzed patient demographics, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analyses, including chi-square and t-tests, were utilized to evaluate the significance of differences in age distribution, hospital stay length, postoperative discomfort, and time to return to regular work. Results: A total of 84 cases were included in the study. Significant differences were observed between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy in terms of age distribution, hospital stay length, and time to resume normal routine work. Statistically significant differences were found in the duration of hospital stays (p=0.002), time to return to normal routine work (p=0.05), and among the 15 to 25 age group (p=0.04). While there was a trend towards significance in postoperative pain (p=0.06), further research is needed for a conclusive understanding. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the short-term outcomes of open hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy, emphasizing the importance of recovery period, age, and hospital stay duration. These results contribute valuable new information to the field of hemorrhoid surgical treatments, aiding physicians in tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs for optimal outcomes. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects and subtle aspects of postoperative pain associated with these surgeries.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stapled Hemorhoidopexy vs. Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Comparative Study of Short-Term Results

Shaukat,

Mustajab,

Sahar

et al. 2023

JHRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Compared with Milligan-Morgan Excision for the Treatment of Prolapsing Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Study

Muhammad Usman Azhar,

Abdullah Umer,

Ahmed Salman Majeed

et al. 2024

IJBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Haemorrhoids, a common rectal and anal pathology, present with symptoms such as pain, bleeding, and prolapse caused by oedematous vascular formations in the anal canal. The conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy, PPH) are frequently used surgical techniques for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Aim: To compare Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy and Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy in treating prolapsing haemorrhoids. Methodology: This prospective comparative cross-sectional study analyzed early postoperative outcomes in 60 patients undergoing either PPH or MMH. The study was conducted at Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Data were collected for six months’ duration from January 2024 to June 2024 using a Likert scale questionnaire adapted from Khan et al. (2009). Descriptive statistics summarized continuous variables like operative time, VAS pain scores, and hospital stay, while categorical variables were analyzed using frequency distributions and the Chi-square test to assess associations between complications and procedure type. Findings and Conclusion: Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy showed significant advantages over MMH, including shorter operative time, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays. It was also associated with fewer complications such as postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, infection, and anal stenosis. These findings align with previous studies, confirming that Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy offers better recovery and lower complication rates, making it a preferred option in healthcare settings

show abstract

Postoperative recovery; Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy versus Conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Stapled Hemorhoidopexy vs. Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Comparative Study of Short-Term Results

Stapled Hemorhoidopexy vs. Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Comparative Study of Short-Term Results

Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Compared with Milligan-Morgan Excision for the Treatment of Prolapsing Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About